PTRs, PTRs everywhere (was: Should a nameserver know about itself?)

Sam Trenholme <namedroppers@artemas.reachin.com> Thu, 10 May 2001 07:14 UTC

Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id DAA20391 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2001 03:14:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f4A6luj0005925 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 10 May 2001 08:47:56 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from naptop.autonomica.se (flaptop.liman.sunet.se [193.10.90.102]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f4A6lsLt005920 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 08:47:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by naptop.autonomica.se (8.12.0.Beta1/8.12.0.Beta1) id f4A6kO5V000461 for dnsop@cafax.se; Thu, 10 May 2001 08:46:24 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from artemas.reachin.com (artemas.reachin.com [64.14.214.33]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f4A08QLt003764 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Thu, 10 May 2001 02:08:26 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 30402 invoked by uid 1233); 9 May 2001 17:08:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2001 17:08:23 -0700
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 17:08:23 -0700
From: Sam Trenholme <namedroppers@artemas.reachin.com>
To: dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: PTRs, PTRs everywhere (was: Should a nameserver know about itself?)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105091706360.30400-100000@artemas.reachin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk

> What does it mean to have a PTR record in anything other than the
> in-addr.arpa tree?

A PTR is a pointer to the FQDN for a given host name.  So, for example, if
artemas.reachin.com is the fully-qualified domain name for the ip of
www.reachin.com, it can make sense to have something like:

www.reachin.com		IN PTR	artemas.reachin.com.

or, using MaraDNS' 'csv1' zone file format:

Pwww.reachin.com.|3600|artemas.reachin.com.

A valid, if pointless, use of the PTR record.

Of course, as Cricket correctly pointed out, a more practical use is
classless in-addr.arpa delegation.

- Sam