IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Tue, 08 March 2022 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9962F3A0BCE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:40:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_kFTIoIqbho for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 749473A07E4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:1488:fffe:6:d280:d705:83fc:2c5] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:d280:d705:83fc:2c5]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 461BB140BD8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:40:20 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1646732420; bh=0klLsQXOcYHsUt6gDLgZ5sOO1h34t8D2ezlhcSqXhk0=; h=Date:To:From; b=HBzGhHfKa4lc9HjbF+OQaqfll5S50BCxMLD6GW8Q3PuuK2u3rke9lSk0NR2lf1CUH fuvRcQQlqWjU8LvxbDUMAHpk9RWkoO+AY9RYUamax7y9XencL6/OPBDskDRhUkr96K /a6LavKKwC5brCX6TbnlHUcjaXKOFBVHY7lQRhcw=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------prE8XQoo0kMychfTTVtJ66yg"
Message-ID: <d0f755bd-fc7c-cc2e-b37b-2608f11d7110@nic.cz>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 10:40:20 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <163777315136.16773.10633006296842101587@ietfa.amsl.com> <4e4527b6-b0b3-33f3-3849-8a593fe29a1d@nic.cz> <ybly22j7m5m.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <95a4103b-dd26-17ba-d4dd-ac82b2bd510f@nic.cz> <yblh78m34og.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <3d348d91-1f36-3e06-7da4-b683ef0d9348@nic.cz> <yblilspwsb4.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <yblilspwsb4.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2MSCZrRMUQCylpF4M8NvfGwPFro>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:40:30 -0000

On 07/03/2022 19.06, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> The -05 version sounds clearer here than -04 ("not respond" above) or
>> -03.  Thanks.
> You should check -06 too -- I restructured it to read better (IMHO)

Right, I agree that -06 is better.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email