Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_130BF330-87D0-49B2-8519-46CE2D6A0161";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\))
From: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHPuVdVgZgKMXFNpiwY5T8gwbPV1ui2Rmbfn9vqOP6BvwBOVXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:07:22 +0700
Message-Id: <D4E045DB-AB33-4D6D-85E7-5DFC47EEB6B4@isc.org>
References: 
 <CADyWQ+GHwYS3T=M+7655Ps5f-mJ7H3FfstDGvHsR_D=eHXf43g@mail.gmail.com>
 <SA1PR15MB43705D3DBC37FB92F3BA5714B3DF2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
 <551bb4a8-f787-4caf-8615-c284203d7b7e@nic.cz>
 <CAHPuVdWwFGKE7QRHXP1Ru9geQdV+VY4-Z-AYgkhac7dQuB9cZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6fa27e23-ec6d-4989-8068-aafb4925d1dd@nic.cz>
 <CAHPuVdUy1s9gaQyJ=GiqdxAPZwUc2-4HvQBCb77c-Zh5feAjvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <C5ABE18F-AB8B-4654-BF93-D660D4240446@fl1ger.de>
 <2a6088fb-3275-464d-bca1-92a4cbaa78aa@nlnetlabs.nl>
 <2b862da9-e428-47f3-9ecc-c55a4e589bac@desec.io>
 <a23915b8-3a28-417c-a709-ef3123c4a74d@nlnetlabs.nl>
 <bc9d2dba-9a9c-4fe5-a484-ace272836007@desec.io>
 <94da4d77-2904-43ba-9bcd-27e22e6a4604@nlnetlabs.nl>
 <88915437-56F7-4393-A1D5-CF95661ACAE6@isc.org>
 <c7ccfdde-04fa-454e-84db-b1a9565c7dc9@nlnetlabs.nl>
 <CAHPuVdVgZgKMXFNpiwY5T8gwbPV1ui2Rmbfn9vqOP6BvwBOVXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Message-ID-Hash: QOG27QTLX6V3VTG3BC4OKQY7TKRKTVAU
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BDNSOP=5D_Re=3A_fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2O2nzB96FCvg_ar8Wk3WuM9CUzU>


--Apple-Mail=_130BF330-87D0-49B2-8519-46CE2D6A0161
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On 19. 3. 2025, at 5:42, Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> I encourage you to resurrect the competing =
fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update and get that published (which I will also =
support).

Let me see. Perhaps, I can resurrect this draft with Fujiwara-san as we =
are probably going to internally do the separation
between delegations and answers in development version of BIND 9.

Perhaps the fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update draft should not update RFC =
1034 Section 5.3.3, but rather provide
an alternative solution. I guess that would make it more likely to be =
adopted.

Cheers,
Ondrej
--
Ond=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD (He/Him)
ondrej@isc.org

My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not =
feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.


--Apple-Mail=_130BF330-87D0-49B2-8519-46CE2D6A0161
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dOlk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_130BF330-87D0-49B2-8519-46CE2D6A0161--