IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 20 December 2016 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B567129A0E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:22:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AEAX-qHHW49A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9412D1299DF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 64BBA2801AD; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:22:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8D628017A; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:22:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C747B38003; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 562F7430ED; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:22:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:22:10 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <20161220152210.he6tuxo3qh6myatw@nic.fr>
References: <CADyWQ+EJ0LO=pU-yUdEHwC3aP5KdXxsnD9kEvmmTeAoe0BxK3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+uwq9ofZ6hdG7Ngyz4s23F0XgiMSzazwFKw7DiTcEFDQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161220105915.xkrk5h57lqqfbsl2@nic.fr> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612201013280.10842@bofh.nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612201013280.10842@bofh.nohats.ca>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2Uql2C4JizGpY3hHriNEd1WDMhU>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:22:44 -0000

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:14:16AM -0500,
 Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote 
 a message of 16 lines which said:

> > One of my comments was not addressed. I would like, in section 10, see
> > some details about what exactly is implemented by Unbound and Google
> > Public DNS:
> > 
> > * synthesis of NXDOMAIN from NSEC (obviously; that's the minimum)
> > * synthesis of NXDOMAIN from NSEC3 (if no opt-out)
> > * synthesis of NODATA from NSEC/NSEC3
> > * synthesis of positive answers from wilcards+NSEC
> > * all of them?
> 
> Do you mean this in the context of RFC 6982?

No, RFC 7942.

> Or do you believe this needs to go into the RFC?

Certainly not.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email