Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02.txt

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36923A170E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mum-4O2j8Qi8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777993A16C9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id n2so448503wmc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=L0iJlFBFoNkEKevMEy4AJrKC4eHhS7F/0gEWR7BkMME=; b=Qa9AyGfdoeHkxcJNRRMNavAoLCwgmtLeHxAon/pOpUvm89WTdqC5i53E1fFXNJJu9u 5YkvtY9fdG6ySWhbIC1JRD4/fbkj3eR6MsTee+WpPG0rurEqTJq5lbdCDp83yAhBkBj4 EWzApeyz+ZN9A/EADpA8uYYTEnjBzRzF5cMdpFwagkuuXxWlTe9kTnlro8IbJUL4OsfE g7YUnghCe+edhc9LSDiFHOmKtgbIzL7s/wiAc3EbWg/ypSlsEqoczqZsEB4gjJsjlZ4V B2bhb93yiPTZSJi8jINv2kx7/6wMODIQ6Ow8sYHw84hTUs3FxrLpu67KoOpLC6TOfIyC DSVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L0iJlFBFoNkEKevMEy4AJrKC4eHhS7F/0gEWR7BkMME=; b=lTBKFf47dBd1oGzt+WxR1TVwEBP/9n17213w7gseCAkZdohPWMAxBFrzrvhgwkjBtk /iiuy+6L/rcE3dsPLYSLfj8uAUoL3ti0GkDaxEXbLccY/FV/ttwbQpaWfdnAfXg1k9A2 00b6m6LYb09ZXJgvqK4lWzF+v8e6OfiR/ipgyH6sIehKzhr5jGgENIL6icKOThnJv9rp +sgDpkOvcrKmBMwn7MXpG5pa915bKycDVdz/JFgx6Vo4GukHc3XmSOoTTliE+fNaq87W QNLL/wXMAK/ie9LWg9gpNs3dsQV+zMy19ldpI7l2SR+VO9BUg9tXbwGAA57CdqH/9N5C QH1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1dhCdnr74Aa8+O4jdOgOxhoJntx/5HnRQsZGvl6UKcC0HwYqsJ q39PtK16B/RdQv/Mt/1lckTPFPy7T6EF8RufGWMQNNQG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtbqZKI6SVtzW/8DAlP3diQKbfJ+oY0qQrrTXk6Up3wPTkS04xEh1hg2kUGGut/HFUG5TYk16CNCD8X6M1QE48=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:41d4:: with SMTP id o203mr1004946wma.1.1583787410769; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158378460735.5647.5593000704951647849@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158378460735.5647.5593000704951647849@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:56:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsD4w7+gx7LhM5YSyBK3cRp4D7qNXOj27pZXns34LMRvZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="00000000000011e48405a0723e4d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2VL4E0Oqb4AHPZRq_pgRX03tb-k>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:56:56 -0000

It occurs to me that I hit "publish" on this draft without updating the
release notes, so I'll mention some of the many changes since -01 here
instead:

 - All changes to Alt-Svc have been removed.  I would like to see some
updates to Alt-Svc, but since this draft is now in DNSOP, and any changes
to Alt-Svc are going to require a long discussion, we've removed them from
this draft and will consider them separately in the future.
- The examples have been expanded and reorganized.
- Priority zero is now the definition of AliasForm, instead of being
reserved for AliasForm.
- Repeated SvcParamKeys are no longer allowed.
- The "=" sign may be omitted in a key=value pair if the value is also
empty.
- In the wire format, SvcParamKeys must be in sorted order.
- New text regarding how to handle resolution timeouts (clients must fail
hard to avoid a downgrade attack)
- Expanded description of recursive resolver behavior
- Much more precise description of the intended ALPN behavior
- Match the HSTS specification's language on HTTPS enforcement
- Removed 'esniconfig=""' mechanism and simplified ESNI connection logic

As always, please review and send comments.  We also expect to do a
presentation on this draft (remotely) in the DNSOP session.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:12 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the
> IETF.
>
>         Title           : Service binding and parameter specification via
> the DNS (DNS SVCB and HTTPSSVC)
>         Authors         : Ben Schwartz
>                           Mike Bishop
>                           Erik Nygren
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02.txt
>         Pages           : 36
>         Date            : 2020-03-09
>
> Abstract:
>    This document specifies the "SVCB" and "HTTPSSVC" DNS resource record
>    types to facilitate the lookup of information needed to make
>    connections for origin resources, such as for HTTPS URLs.  SVCB
>    records allow an origin to be served from multiple network locations,
>    each with associated parameters (such as transport protocol
>    configuration and keying material for encrypting TLS SNI).  They also
>    enable aliasing of apex domains, which is not possible with CNAME.
>    The HTTPSSVC DNS RR is a variation of SVCB for HTTPS and HTTP
>    origins.  By providing more information to the client before it
>    attempts to establish a connection, these records offer potential
>    benefits to both performance and privacy.
>
>    TO BE REMOVED: This proposal is inspired by and based on recent DNS
>    usage proposals such as ALTSVC, ANAME, and ESNIKEYS (as well as long
>    standing desires to have SRV or a functional equivalent implemented
>    for HTTP).  These proposals each provide an important function but
>    are potentially incompatible with each other, such as when an origin
>    is load-balanced across multiple hosting providers (multi-CDN).
>    Furthermore, these each add potential cases for adding additional
>    record lookups in-addition to AAAA/A lookups.  This design attempts
>    to provide a unified framework that encompasses the key functionality
>    of these proposals, as well as providing some extensibility for
>    addressing similar future challenges.
>
>    TO BE REMOVED: The specific name for this RR type is an open topic
>    for discussion.  "SVCB" and "HTTPSSVC" are meant as placeholders as
>    they are easy to replace.  Other names might include "B", "SRV2",
>    "SVCHTTPS", "HTTPS", and "ALTSVC".
>
>    TO BE REMOVED: This document is being collaborated on in Github at:
>    https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc [1].  The most recent
>    working version of the document, open issues, etc. should all be
>    available there.  The authors (gratefully) accept pull requests.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-02
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>