Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace

Cathy Almond <cathya@isc.org> Mon, 31 March 2014 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cathya@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156EC1A0682 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 03:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VM0fBEJYwmru for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 03:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10661A0681 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 03:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB532383CA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cathya@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2623216005D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:53:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from om.home (host86-174-189-131.range86-174.btcentralplus.com [86.174.189.131]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7F85160050 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:53:46 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <533948F0.1000803@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:52:32 +0100
From: Cathy Almond <cathya@isc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20140326092227.GA6898@inet.tu-berlin.de> <CAHw9_iKdNWicD+yWDo8+JkBg=8_V4tc=NpWBxtt3Fm8cjK8FCg@mail.gmail.com> <20140326164132.GA32879@isc.org> <5335D11C.3000202@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <5335D11C.3000202@dougbarton.us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2W9qJpJjidLMZ2IltId699eCzws
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:52:50 -0000

On 28/03/2014 19:44, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/26/2014 9:41 AM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:52:44PM +0800, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>> "Feature", but does catch many folk by surprise.
>>> I'd written a patch and given it to someone at ISC that makes dig
>>> output a warning message if you hand it both the "+trace" and
>>> "@server" options. Dunno what happened, but never got integrated...
>>
>> My apologies for not sending feedback directly. (That's something
>> we really need to work on.) IIRC, we opted to clarify the documentation
>> rather than add a warning to dig itself.  There's also a knowledge base
>> article on this topic at http://tinyurl.com/o37rpgm.
> 
> Given that the number of people using the tool vastly exceeds the number
> who read the docs, multiplied by the number of times this comes up on
> bind-users (where this discussion should have happened in the first
> place), IMO also putting the warning in the tool makes more sense.
> 
> FWIW,
> 
> Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Feature request is #31814 (I merged Warren's original suggestion with a
later one asking for much the same).

Comments noted and I've 'prodded' this one for you (although the outcome
may depend on other factors, including future plans for the new delve
tool - see BIND 9.10.0b2).

Cathy