Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sat, 13 November 2010 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB073A69C6 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:07:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.465
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.405, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JnSoq3436gPh for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D0CFB3A6860 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 55969 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2010 07:40:28 -0000
Received: from softbank219178199025.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.11.2?) (219.178.199.25) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 13 Nov 2010 07:40:28 -0000
Message-ID: <4CDE391B.7010306@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:07:07 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <B35360B6-0DB9-49CB-B68E-09DFFFB1ACA0@icann.org> <31FCAB67-9E3E-4E2B-957F-1A1F628AA8FB@hopcount.ca> <4CDC6D23.6070309@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <61252B4A-571B-4879-B945-556C03DE2A96@frobbit.se> <4CDDD642.8080108@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <p06240802c903943c5f38@[130.129.72.80]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240802c903943c5f38@[130.129.72.80]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:07:30 -0000

Paul Hoffman wrote:

>>> If you want more clarification than that (and the reference to
>>> RFC5890 where it is discussed further), please send text.
>>
>> OK. Add the following:
>>
>>    As the upper case character corresponding to 'y' with diaeresis
>>    is not uniquely defined, for example, localized domain names
>>    are unusable
>>
>>    It should be noted that, extended case insensitivities beyond
>>    European characters, such as correspondence between Chinese
>>    ones, the problem is even more unsolvable.
>>
>> It should clarify how localized domain names are useless.
> 
> -1. There are different documents in which to beat this dead horse.

I sent text for more clarification because I was requested to do
so by some non-ASCII name.

But, I'm fine if draft-liman-tld-names- is abandoned and all
the RFCs related to localized domain names are declared to be
historic.

						Masataka Ohta

PS

While it is trivially easy to define ASCII representation of
Unicode, it is impossible to operate it, especially when
(extended) case insensitivities are involved.