IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Mon, 12 March 2018 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300AE124239 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inf1qBW2MR5w for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635971200C1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.41] (p4FE4E7A0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.228.231.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADA1C7594B; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 21:18:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5AA6EEA5.4060404@redbarn.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 14:18:29 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.24 (Windows/20180302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
CC: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
References: <151990782328.10030.7325038774873512859@ietfa.amsl.com> <9ab0208f-29e3-10b0-e360-125257b2b238@bellis.me.uk> <CAJE_bqe-5-aD7yTkTSzu+fpSDEJw_TCYyL792cfqboDQXhmJ_g@mail.gmail.com> <20180310162615.GA28458@jurassic> <CAJE_bqfttqXqCnH6d8EKFVVsnoyRkdNW2ZmTX6Veqn3zF2oHLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfttqXqCnH6d8EKFVVsnoyRkdNW2ZmTX6Veqn3zF2oHLA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2aoehtoLuX82W6DKn8SoZmcN65s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-muks-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 21:18:33 -0000

even after talking to muks@isc offline, i still don't understand why the 
original metazone proposal can't simply be standardized.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email