IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 11 May 2021 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204393A1D47 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIhwzQiPLqw6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA563A1D1E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 62A9523AFC; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Cc: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <bfaa3ab3-3d96-dcec-a175-5803de03d852@NLnetLabs.nl> <eb62e04b-2511-ac14-b2e1-c29eab64acfc@nic.cz>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:17:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <eb62e04b-2511-ac14-b2e1-c29eab64acfc@nic.cz> ("Vladimír Čunát"'s message of "Mon, 10 May 2021 19:45:57 +0200")
Message-ID: <yblwns5ckje.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2moFJO9Xcz9TAthUuBAaCZqwYDo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:17:22 -0000

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> writes:

Hi Vladimír,

Thanks for the comments.

> I'd also expect something on limits accepted by secondaries.  And some
> details are probably up to further discussion (e.g. particular numbers
> and SERVFAIL), but I don't think such details would block adoption.

That's certainly an interesting thing to think about, but it starts to
get in between the relationship of primaries and secondaries.  Is that
something that should be "standardized"?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email