Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with DISCUSS)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 11 October 2018 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED4C127AC2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CQl4xKH_cEmv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B87B130E63 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id e187-v6so9429512wmf.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U1Qsk/RSuZEypDeLtVwXbImeVJkPtAT2157lIEK70Ls=; b=G6+3PgthM9ktkpxmkF/JTZwGOVuR2cok4JNtSJ9qL8t9w/0oJ2zGXMEerLUWtEQzG9 rQnQbboBGi0W1uaKXKZoNKZonFO70VWE6d4xVRzrdtrV0Wxo74rDDPjWAhbQZJzROk+I gcgHbIYvSGNtq3opvLOMVSDIsEAQ5/VnCbkkwUzH7BrfvQju+HEkfY9WucSzM0kVn+WM uhfnp5n8bRFMTfUO6O6zIG7HJk8+oq/N7yGffzKgx2Q/XGIkwwzP0Ttri1hp6Rp8YNhb A5lwPSLvaTcbNMZGMxwJoeq5VRMNPL4qqdW52AcgbzK2jsUYlA/P3fQZMBn2FLRTh0KW 6oUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U1Qsk/RSuZEypDeLtVwXbImeVJkPtAT2157lIEK70Ls=; b=oTOFwtdwAMjKUJNEKS5yy19t0YPt7rI/PuyB6uKb/WM6cr5huBCOJtahPOArCxnUva FdNH96ZQEZowlkUIjNJoVC+wDP0lxiF8OHSwnV18SXI1xmlMCejeUoFsIe9YQyYaJmmc eNvb7Cn/u6s0rz/CK5/A8sL69C9fYe/OqAjFIDudSdRCmWvB0Wi1PwOcntr9Xd5zMgBI 9+sjx5gIVy1OySVP1zyV6mxGmAN8ohsTWHBwsMxGqZ+u119426rthLArOstrBQ1aBH4/ u3z3DQsyyuZMdDdv+8FWYGkMoOWZU7D53AIink96kU21wYgyWMUiVeBizCdak/of8p8P kY8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiONuOsCBt/z1KfA+6F4io/dZn3jYqHus7Y1VwyJhg3VPhKGpdj sen+m/avTQLogOqQt6dkw7um+yU92blZS/im2o3oWg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62GtKADKo3ronu4j1uAyUFj1jOLNAyxgmwBIhNhAOdJL2TxtXQfm5ekVe93Lo21LbOc6ygPVvCi99G5/PNgRSk=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1250:: with SMTP id 77-v6mr1681922wms.70.1539263542410; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153920722543.5924.12920795403929512043.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iKyD_X-+fUjDv5hhUs--Djw0dZ3r7g94zVfE5bCtbag5w@mail.gmail.com> <c735e396-5cf9-0dbd-83c8-49ff69ff135b@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <c735e396-5cf9-0dbd-83c8-49ff69ff135b@dcrocker.net>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:12:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iK3w1c9v2az01RtgJW2qGz7-hOVgZY8f+T4ymXi43Htvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Cc: Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>, DNSOP Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a953a40577f3b8b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2nE9x-S0o5KDsZUVD3i4Lb_ueFQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:12:28 -0000

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:18 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>; wrote:

> On 10/11/2018 8:01 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > I just arrived in Amsterdam, and am somewhat bleary, but I'm not sure I
> > understand your question / point -- is it simply normalizing the IANA
> > language?
>
>
> Offlist he explained to me that the main concern was a normative
> requirement, without the specification detail to be sure to satisfy it.
>
> The issue was rendered moot by the removal of the normative language
> from that draft.
>

Ah, thank you.

I’d like to apologize for being distracted / not as involved in the
balloting as I usually am; my travels and the upcoming KSK Roll have both
been taking lots of my focus.

W



> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf