Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-07.txt

["Woodworth, John R" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSOP [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson
>
> Hi, I am brought here because of the notification of this in v6ops.
>
> I am supportive of the general idea of having these kinds of bulk records
> standardized.
>

Hi Mikael,

Thank you for your interest and comments, they are welcome and appreciated.

>
> I read the draft, and if I understand correctly it currently
> proposes to not have DNSSEC support without on-the-fly signing.
>

We introduced a number of concepts with our initial draft, including support
for offline DNSSEC.  After a number of discussions with others we determined
our solution (NPN RR's) may be better suited for a broader scope and are
planning to move it into its own draft.  Our hope is for others to benefit
from our effort and promote similar concepts and features yet to come.

Our immediate goal is to get the draft adopted by the WG so we can iron
out the details as a community.  I feel we've demonstrated our openness
to change and willingness to forge this draft into what can be the most
useful and greatest benefit to those concerned.  This definitely includes
support of DNSSEC its many challenges.

>
> I am extremely opposed to introducing new features into DNS that doesn't
> support DNSSEC.
>

Agreed.  We only recently removed NPN RR's (offline support) from our
draft in hopes it may simplify and garner more support for the draft.

We are open to reintroducing it if that makes more sense.


Thanks again,
John
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [e-mail]
-- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER:
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.