Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 18 September 2016 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF0812B032 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qbZzWk6lHthr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23FB12B15F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77485 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2016 23:44:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 18 Sep 2016 23:44:06 -0000
Date: 18 Sep 2016 23:43:46 -0000
Message-ID: <20160918234346.78983.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=xNaHpO-ZxusWK9_UBzOpKa0zk0y0h7iGvRS2P=Og-3g@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2uIkSXmpqEMLHgPf3vwJGSnnVcU>
Cc: mellon@fugue.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:44:13 -0000

>To John's point, short isn't actually good, because it's important to
>document the context--

No, really, short is essential.  I'm happy to add the context once we
have a concise statement of what the problem is.

> But we tried to keep the actual
>problem statement short and pithy; if you really think it's too long,
>perhaps you could suggest shorter wordings that still capture the actual
>problems.

Ah.  See previous message for some examples.  In neither of the
documents can I tell whether dealing with the toxic waste names is
supposed to be in or out of scope.

R's,
John