Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8906 (6783)

Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org> Tue, 14 December 2021 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A9C3A096B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:03:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=d8dyDRLL; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=AHI5PPoo
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GnsIrdO4G0fN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D0A83A096E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 01:03:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (zimbrang.isc.org [149.20.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C95244358BF; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1639472603; bh=rNeqOJCvyvC18caeShq9m873xn/4uZRhH/Vt9/6+Lc8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=d8dyDRLLeyFoFNVcq9tGssXUc2MK+J/mIywcm1tPXH/yauOQS7NPA0hgsWI32SHsj fz7b8592U7i7TNbuKYQkHvj83X24Vnui8gN4gU2rBzBHcN0lV63Z6TSG638TCFHQ2M O9jWetV59O5LWIZP32emiVYaz+rdwoLP6omgijgg=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F77F2A1F4; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2FCF2A1F5; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbrang.isc.org AB2FCF2A1F5
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1639472599; bh=5UqJydashrRsE5s8ovv9oUSfdQmxa5Dk0rBvAGfkXcg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=AHI5PPoo7p47U1vPjFbdMw/2dBJDVjXzhiVgskBxp7oNSqi/nMjniz5R2kRbax9t+ zXSY45OOLH75VGKgQo98IGOIlSQ5cHzbfbXraWjKUL6ZcVOq4EtFrQwzy+44V+xoyd ev7nfTLeDzt7c450HRvJh6RkD8dZG4cl+Ldl0nBg=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbrang.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Lul5BrerLlI6; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.2.144] (unknown [216.213.168.24]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B66FEF2A1F4; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:18 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <9b6a385e-c69d-1134-d4bb-63092bebee16@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:16 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: muks@mukund.org, marka@isc.org, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20211214082846.E3558EEA0C@rfc-editor.org>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20211214082846.E3558EEA0C@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2ynAJCJCRQqyr0162Yq_qBQV7k8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8906 (6783)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:03:31 -0000


On 14/12/2021 08:28, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8906,
> "A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to Communicate".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6783
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>
> 
> Section: 8.2.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> as unknown EDNS options are supposed to be ignored by the
>     server (Section 6.1.1 of [RFC6891]).
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> as unknown EDNS options are supposed to be ignored by the
>     server (Section 6.1.2 of [RFC6891]).
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Reference to the section in RFC 6891 is incorrect. There's no information on what to do with unknown options in RFC 6891 section 6.1.1.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8906 (draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-23)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to Communicate
> Publication Date    : September 2020
> Author(s)           : M. Andrews, R. Bellis
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Domain Name System Operations
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

The erratum is correct - the reference should be to 6.1.2, not 6.1.1

kind regards,

Ray