IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] fyi [Pdns-users] Please test: ALIAS/ANAME apex record in PowerDNS

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Sun, 21 September 2014 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14DC1A0233 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3oBgfiM-VABO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860141A0218 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c9so2640242qcz.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to; bh=YsP4LXzABOZ2lrt35aEuKVVoWPayhRA5wskJhDM22KM=; b=NDONaysjiu0CwNkC5xfx3rRv+/xqXR/lWr1L71RuSI0gGE7pHdEB6/ZrSclMUXs9xU RcAM6798Tzn9oOAWelZAgoZuyit/yhDkukpM/rshaaAwRbE7Ne1C8Hy2drxHLFcWRies WNILQa4UzVosJEVbt2C1fejtCCDHoXzqi+HJG5MpM/wvCcR4r57drFyPNJkeT89qg9im M4kypUykbITFyHyAYvNaX6qSlBriIlqZO6twtHtt03H29ZschxbKclayOKhBzfFFI5eG ahcCfErgs16+YcTaVp4JzfNpxrplxjA7SIVp/Sc5rWISwVsqDdB0kWJbebkj1fMVB7wJ xfoA==
X-Received: by 10.224.95.9 with SMTP id b9mr17117124qan.61.1411330494743; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:6:3a80:77e:5177:f2a2:2c35:79c2? ([2601:6:3a80:77e:5177:f2a2:2c35:79c2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w15sm6243096qaw.23.2014.09.21.13.14.53 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_64BF4C3C-25DC-4C2E-893B-01811E95FBC1"
Message-Id: <457731AF-E11F-4B1C-AC32-5E1AEE4EC5E5@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:14:51 -0400
References: <20140921115222.GB16178@xs.powerdns.com> <541F1AE8.6010709@redbarn.org>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <541F1AE8.6010709@redbarn.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/30GIYat5SGLWZddZfmAlbsR6W-I
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] fyi [Pdns-users] Please test: ALIAS/ANAME apex record in PowerDNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:14:58 -0000

Hi,

This topic has come up here many times before, and there always seems to be interest. A fielded implementation and Paul's suggestion of an interoperable spec both seem like healthy developments.


Suzanne

On Sep 21, 2014, at 2:37 PM, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:

> 
> 
>> 	bert hubert	Sunday, September 21, 2014 4:52 AM
>> ...
>> 
>> PS: the above is currently not yet supported for DNSSEC domains!
>> 
> i'd be very interested in a standards-track (interoperable; including DNSSEC support and AXFR/IXFR) version of this feature. my hope is that you will remove out-of-zone capability here, that is, the target of ALIAS should have to be authority data in the same zone. this would simplify the DNSSEC case, but more importantly, it would avoid having authority servers make upstream queries.
> 
> if you decide to work on this, i'll contribute as at least a reviewer and perhaps (if invited) as an editor.
> 
> -- 
> Paul Vixie
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email