Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329AB130DBE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtlE_oQzELNt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1308124BE5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id h2-v6so162740itj.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Fs6RuTecSReTlDwI76ZbHJJqGLaC5vgmpLSODE2V6Wc=; b=W+DpN1x07/A9seWf5Wzr3q6LmQtMOe3UkE/AJzLRSJk1RG5r8e7CtYQ4utu/YlAuHH o/loTteyilbEM5TZyWKcxLVcvOfcPWZQnVfOu1EwGtGK0fBs4NDgB8gx2i/AyWvDd5G+ Wwmul2+dyMh3f0Cbxi8bRVtODuYdyqzMhzZkFNCahiQEHjTNNz5+569vsuBBSEtVMg1/ Zaaf8BqCukOS3OporoEOp6c80byCCaciGMWnpJwnDTp4qyJKYJOYkYHp7onCeg1Nangb xtcujFZIAUP4MANuVdKNciG2DO3664Q3fptoPxt1WbmfTSTUO5MsCj4dEWdTBDHdmG2u N0bA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Fs6RuTecSReTlDwI76ZbHJJqGLaC5vgmpLSODE2V6Wc=; b=k2aWjH/NfMEJP4OhR2tDD+BozNDzfgxhRe7ZuL6Gj3ZIxS0bLQ31pkiMMh57FV4TmJ c5WGKd9Sgrsq6rER2bNYaOW1SYfCRBzfsUZvzT7CiHL99LqnBkOc/Jbf94UNRvotNgXZ SoFoT2ABlB9rRl5nWkD2FpUOtRcGgwpBV+15oUALIHDEKmor8/EfHKzEinBI7GatkT1T VYcrSkaMnJWKiLPHrknb5AQWDGaRfUi2DYCd7kGrz0L9ngoOqsuOrBaDU7DnqruNqwJi 2HNZbC0WDfom8Voi5R/nm3r+/zkz0tW4OusHKkfsM1/4dwGtYaEjxqhesskda1ZcqOqa TUVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlE1pOKdzTv4r2RnAi4y/3YW0kivCCnomen88OF6iYZS45GklY3f hS7tpkiRro5it/LVNb82y1Bf0SVS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcNSv7eS9lqNWw8k+zxSBPy9Zek/BfS5cxwQUQqFVlSM+eL7jYM0boSGoLpS3S02T1XlNm8sA==
X-Received: by 2002:a24:764d:: with SMTP id z74-v6mr2361610itb.34.1531846920945; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:2590:c95b:fa9:2ddc? ([2001:67c:1232:144:2590:c95b:fa9:2ddc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3-v6sm689183iod.26.2018.07.17.10.01.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15F79)
In-Reply-To: <20180717121406.GA6681@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:01:57 -0400
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E1026DD-2304-43FE-BEED-B9CE2981D9E3@gmail.com>
References: <20180717121406.GA6681@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/35PEjVPi2RofLRV4wvVJ5P3daj4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:02:05 -0000

I’d like to see a more fleshed out operational considerations section.  

Tim
As chair 

From my high tech gadget

> On Jul 17, 2018, at 08:14, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> Greetings. With more resolvers implementing QNAME minimisation, and
> even turning it on by default, we thought that this is a good time to
> update RFC 7816 and make it a standard. In order to get things moving,
> we have published a very early draft draft-bortzmeyer-rfc7816bis-00
> that is mostly the original RFC but with a few questions and holes
> added (see the text near the strings "TODO"). If folks in the WG is
> interested, feel free to comment in the non-GitHub repo listed in the
> draft, or here on the list.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop