Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns-clientid

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Tue, 28 March 2017 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40DD1267BB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4zVSWhb7qTJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.7bits.nl (shannon.7bits.nl [89.188.0.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24B5E129686 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:666:0:51b3:5d28:da31:8cf4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter) by shannon.7bits.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0A88C1B96; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:31:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:31:47 +0200
Message-ID: <DB1F2A9F-1473-49D7-B0A0-FBD077B09CF9@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <22745.38650.113925.208670@gro.dd.org>
References: <22745.38650.113925.208670@gro.dd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3B-B6Hy4jHgfPQWa2KI_a8zVvtU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns-clientid
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:31:51 -0000

Hello,

On 28 Mar 2017, at 0:49, Dave Lawrence wrote:

> Speaking of Ray's draft, our proposal is able to handle his use case
> but unfortunately our use cases are not achievable in his.  I'd
> welcome joining up.

Please note that neither draft handles the use case of also passing the 
port number, which in a world of growing CGN deployment, may soon prove 
quite important.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/