Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Andy Newton's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-automation-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
From: [email-masked]
To: Andy Newton <[email-masked]>, The IESG <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 11:55:59 +0000
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>

Re-, 

Works for me, Andy. Thanks.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Andy Newton <[email-masked]>
> Envoyé : mercredi 20 mai 2026 13:11
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email-masked]>;
> The IESG <[email-masked]>
> Cc : [email-masked]; [email-masked]; draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-
> [email-masked]
> Objet : Re: [DNSOP] Andy Newton's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-ds-
> automation-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> 
> 
> On 20-05-2026 12:47 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
> > Hi Andy, all,
> >
> > I trust the authors will engage soon.
> >
> > Rather than repeating the exception/implication of not following
> a SHOULD for these items, the document factorizes that given that
> the same reasoning applies:
> >
> > CURRENT:
> >     The recommendations optimize interoperability and safety.
> In certain
> >     cases, local policy may take precedence, such as when a
> registry is
> >     subjected to national cryptographic policy requirements or
> performs
> >     out-of-band verification of DS changes with a human for
> high-stake
> >     domains.  However, not following any requirements designated
> with the
> >     "SHOULD" key word will generally lead to undesirable effects
> of
> >     ambiguity and interoperability issues.  When implementing
> these
> >     recommendations, operators have to carefully weigh whether
> any
> >     particular deviation is justified in their particular
> context.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Med
> 
> Hi Med,
> 
> I appreciate the difficulty with balancing the need to allow local
> policy while offering technical guidance.
> 
> Can the above be strengthened? Such as the last sentence:
> 
>      When implementing these recommendations, operators MUST
> mitigate issues arising from
>      any particular deviation.
> 
> -andy
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.