IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Mon, 15 June 2020 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2813A0FBC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dnss.ec
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmTIDDDmlMXj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1AA83A0FC9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id u13so102046iol.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nZIJNKq3bw/P9Y94h2g2ZyMFA7b9tRGQGuQnoRURbmA=; b=ghOM+1jXUdy+8UDTeapyW7Ou581sRSD8NUlem1/SzUQotW6sGJhwXqZ4BltjYop1dP YwEbitHSGr7mpbUZ1XuyhB713CGhVVD2x/IHdzd5kxX0xLyk1KCZWRBHrsPId1ECmfi6 gtiIc6kh3wyKERQr3m5N2xS5J4p83rH0O3UU8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nZIJNKq3bw/P9Y94h2g2ZyMFA7b9tRGQGuQnoRURbmA=; b=UA8hsEiRjwD2G3cn0xC0ktDHJKatOv9b/npclf5fKciEFin0prDDrN2qSC/buhLCXk kZKHkXudcWUW3CHVF7F4HwOfs6ClGrz9P5Ood8fURjNcK2tugocixuBw0ZPFpgVzp+Gh T8usfjNz+OOUO4ZLAIW3SDjNJrlHl/Y3B1KlTSS7xOu6koEaEt+BE/aUJ9n5H3U09zsY evTWBtM6dzrE6qPVQlgURpvyLBezMZNIzlQoSEMMDsd5Mz01V/E5rZV7on2Mg0HYexGw tqX1yYdNRloxUKe+3roWumJCMMz9qRv6g5iAP7soSggLtcEgxDCrmfQtgKNul/ad9iqH +QBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53215Pof1hfrT0f65vXfCbmWrqAe51OgVNK7Wd0upOgmi0q/HCqf buer2AFNINfWMCzW5akp4Ro4rQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYJbTegJHj608uDnvaecrqs6xShpedKErZs6NP2fG5w3O1/0YWi6AMI4e1Us7g+q6F00SrzA==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8d44:: with SMTP id p65mr377036iod.24.1592264649849; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (host86-175-77-184.range86-175.btcentralplus.com. [86.175.77.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 129sm8653929iou.2.2020.06.15.16.44.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <ybld060hua9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:44:05 +0100
Cc: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2ECFE9BE-39A4-49FA-9533-4E0E57AACE48@dnss.ec>
References: <CADyWQ+F=JA6fogcy_JGRJaZv=Hq52ozgmY5gmzfPm=1oHcJXKg@mail.gmail.com> <20339DD6-6ED5-4977-A307-7497BA786C67@gmail.com> <ybld060hua9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3UTNCWIoaEQYte2IQsiY5m2JdVQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 23:44:30 -0000


> On 15 Jun 2020, at 22:51, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:
> 
> Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> 1. This draft as written takes no formal action to reserve anything
>> for any particular purpose.
> 
> No, but it does make the recommendation to use unreserved space.

No.

This is not unreserved space. This is space reserved, for the user. By the ISO, blessed by RFC1591.

>  But it
> "proposes that nay of them can be used by a network or application for
> private use." [section 5].

Yes, as designed by the original drafters of the ISO3166 standards and used today, as intended, by a wide variety of organisations, including the IETF.

>  Fundamentally, the end effect is the same:
> we recommend you use these "unreserved" code points.

Not unreserved.

>  The net effect in
> real world traffic will likely be the same (by design).

Sure.

>  And the net
> effect in policy will likely be the same: a potential collision that

What?

> forces other organizations to never register them because the defacto
> standard created by this non-registration would be to treat it like it
> was a registration.  [see .onion]

The can never be registered. There is no collision. That is the point of all of this.

Roy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email