Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-03.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 03 July 2017 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B207126D05 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sr2J4odXuiMf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258BB129B0D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.117.148] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v63GsaqA045648 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:54:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [169.254.117.148]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Marc Groeneweg" <Marc.Groeneweg@sidn.nl>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:55:18 -0700
Message-ID: <E496A00E-0BCC-4CEF-962D-1BEC918592D3@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CD5B61E2-2075-45EF-BE97-35336BEE277F@sidn.nl>
References: <149907291397.4998.8059630450980375262@ietfa.amsl.com> <555FCD98-C509-4D9A-ADDB-9621623E109E@sinodun.com> <CD5B61E2-2075-45EF-BE97-35336BEE277F@sidn.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3ZVGZaOPPBJSlAqwP1SsN3CjF2U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 16:55:22 -0000

On 3 Jul 2017, at 5:34, Marc Groeneweg wrote:

> What’s the status of the IPR filed by Ray Bellis? Is this a viable 
> IPR claims?

The status is that he filed it. It doesn't matter whether there are 
viable claims in it.

> Ray states himself that the claim may have implications, but is not 
> sure.

Correct.

> And in my opinion, no one at Nominet has claimed this IPR.

That opinion matches a search of the IPR database for 
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format.

> Can we drop this claim, and proceed this draft to standard?

There is no need to "drop this claim" in order to move the draft 
forward. Plenty of documents in the IETF have claims like this 
associated with them.

--Paul Hoffman