[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Request: Review changes - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03 → 04.

[Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]>]

To everyone who reviewed draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis in WG Last Call: please carefully review the diff. Based on a very good IETF Last Call review from Petr Špaček, we had to make a significant technical change to the XML format, and we want to be sure that it works for everyone. We also updated the example (of course), and in doing so found a way to simplify the material around the example.

All comments welcome (until my birthday, August 18).

--Paul Hoffman

On Aug 9, 2024, at 11:05, Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear DNSOP,
> 
> During the DNSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03, Petr Špaček identified an issue: if you include the DNSKEY material you also need to include the flags. 
> 
> The authors have published a new version addressing these changes, as well as addressing more minor comments received during IETF LC. 
> 
> As this required a change to the XML syntax, I'd like to get the DNSOP WGs review / feedback on these changes. 
> 
> The IANA is eagerly awaiting this becoming a standard so that they can update their trust anchor with the DNSKEY material - so, if you have any strong objections to these changes, please let me know by end of day (anywhere!) on Aug 18th
> 
> Latest version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis/
> Diff from -03: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-04&difftype=--html
> 
> Thanks,
> W