Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt

Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> Thu, 11 May 2017 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bjorn@mork.no>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7386212EC51 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mork.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-yTOefrgogY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canardo.mork.no (canardo.mork.no [IPv6:2001:4641::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1DF129BD8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miraculix.mork.no (miraculix.mork.no [IPv6:2001:4641:0:2:7627:374e:db74:e353]) (authenticated bits=0) by canardo.mork.no (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v4BHEqUc019558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2017 19:14:52 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mork.no; s=b; t=1494522892; bh=CTLpRyK4aGSkpjsUdIN7A/NmISy7ioK3VRfNAOuwyPg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:Message-ID:From; b=hNSVdh4kR5a6kE9zW/a23jKi1GS7Y9qeC88IZXq0+qFDt2W5Wt/YyimGwJKUrLaHt 6E2zJY8j3PpkRvreapyehrRtA+4ZNV1rNxGY3fJn0ee9v2O9mPYElPt7Z4QL45UMTm lO1ijjZELv1GsXJSoiFjUmqGDm+l8GxpGHj65gcE=
Received: from bjorn by miraculix.mork.no with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <bjorn@mork.no>) id 1d8rfw-00049O-4P; Thu, 11 May 2017 19:14:52 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
To: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, paul@redbarn.org
Organization: m
References: <20170511165852.34338.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 19:14:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170511165852.34338.qmail@ary.lan> (John Levine's message of "11 May 2017 16:58:52 -0000")
Message-ID: <87wp9n48oj.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130015 (Ma Gnus v0.15) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at canardo
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3chqJQ8VHl7B5SCBgk9WaL7rkkU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 17:20:08 -0000

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> writes:

> What would be the operational advantage of accepting mail from IPv6 hosts
> too lame to set up rDNS?

The answer is pretty much the same as the answer to the question:
"What would be the operational advantage of accepting mail?"



Bjørn