Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 19 September 2018 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1030E131038 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p7py-0KPyVlG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5E113101F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:45816) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1g2dQI-000mBs-08 (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:25:46 +0100
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:25:45 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Anthony Eden <anthony.eden=40dnsimple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZSDgCGx73HhtkuQL8WQAhAxGv57h53c+R9xG=Es2sCejYDhw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191519260.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191455190.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAOZSDgCGx73HhtkuQL8WQAhAxGv57h53c+R9xG=Es2sCejYDhw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3hXeaHq8WRhYQgajSblRxCkV38U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:25:50 -0000

Anthony Eden <anthony.eden=40dnsimple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:

> FWIW, there's still always
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-eden-alias-rr-type/

I get the impression that a lot of the objection to the current ANAME
draft is that it specifies that auth servers do ANAME target lookups and
record substitution; your draft says the same thing. I think those
objections are reasonable, but I don't think the problem lookups are
particularly important (or even helpful).

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>;  http://dotat.at/
Northwest Fitzroy: Southwesterly 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 in far northwest.
Moderate or rough, occasionally very rough in far northwest. Rain. Good,
occasionally poor.