Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 16 February 2014 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60F41A025B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:53:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iUXrXzgJlmgr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64A1A00B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-67.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1GFqvZh054422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:52:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-67.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.67] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D7D40732-1110-49D5-B6B0-F3CB956D6453"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <53006595.5010207@frobbit.se>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:52:55 -0800
Message-Id: <784CF51A-937B-4131-85BC-AED579FA746D@vpnc.org>
References: <CAESS1RPh+UK+r=JzZ9nE_DUqcvNtZiS6TNt1CDN-C0uiU7HP=A@mail.gmail.com> <52FEF407.30405@redbarn.org> <20140215140133.GA6990@sources.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca> <D82F49E8-9A06-4F52-8E3E-DF5C8D0B7549@virtualized.org> <53006595.5010207@frobbit.se>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3lqy5QU8aNlxs_XHSrzmOpwzVJ8
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:53:07 -0000

On Feb 15, 2014, at 11:15 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:

> On 2014-02-16 03:04, David Conrad wrote:
>> Perhaps DNSOP actually is the DNS innovation WG (if perhaps only as a seeding ground)?
> 
> The largest problem for IETF and DNS innovation is that the consensus in
> IETF seems to be that innovation of DNS is not possible unless it
> involves reuse of the TXT resource record.

Sorry, friend, but this is trolling. Or do you believe that DANE is not an innovation?

--Paul Hoffman