IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)

"John Dickinson" <jad@sinodun.com> Fri, 09 August 2019 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jad@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3789E12008F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 02:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sinodun.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IjeVTqzEKFI1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 02:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF2D120024 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 02:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sinodun.com ; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=N9rGZkS4g9kCRtQPVYTVTmnmKD4E+qQ5r+CITvpvKec=; b=f03dExkKOn3ZQ170r1NrqDKb8L yXBydBWqsedmTLREYhIIv6Q9XUT4PTw4tQqJUeSpWq8mNIvXrkqYDmGhr6qgPDK8GUi+i3FtbI+GB 8EB/ckJWA8DsOkiI9+iUbPLdnpC6uUFWWQ1w9Ig5tW3+oMW5DOzkEwLUCMuhMs4rOZ35gAxpXBmQd TuHwuLKufn29ejkfZaNzwoeJi6/mFFnjuDdm4P7aOBBmknjqmoU0Kw6ZSEkv99aANdBFZ/KzGf9+E VWN8SeJxD2Tyju/ISlXklpv6O3XnxuXBFM13ZOUj7O1Z0JBGcoOX9WUpVgesHd3BIFh0lHGxTAisf CcuV6wow==;
Received: from [2001:b98:204:102:fffa::7] (port=62002 helo=[192.168.12.13]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <jad@sinodun.com>) id 1hw0vS-00021U-0e; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:11:10 +0100
From: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ray@isc.org, cheshire@apple.com, sara@sinodun.com, mellon@fugue.com, pusateri@bangj.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, suzworldwide@gmail.com, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, andrew@depht.com, dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 10:10:57 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <BDCD75E6-32A7-4E4A-A00A-1261FC2E9519@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190809084729.4A3CDB80B92@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20190809084729.4A3CDB80B92@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_6C810747-4C47-4AB5-AA2A-E2CBDD775629_="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3lvl8CnP-hGGavXT7b3zJSsYOw8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 09:11:21 -0000

Hi,

After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying Updated by RFC7766 but the document does not say that.

regards
John

On 9 Aug 2019, at 9:47, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
> "DNS Stateful Operations".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5804
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
>
> Section: GLOBAL
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> RFC8490 states that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> I believe RFC8490 is not updated by RFC7766.
>
> Notes
> -----
> I'm not sure if this actually errata, but it should be fixed regardless. The data tracker page for RFC8490 state that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8490
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8490 (draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-20)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : DNS Stateful Operations
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Bellis, S. Cheshire, J. Dickinson, S. Dickinson, T. Lemon, T. Pusateri
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Domain Name System Operations
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG


John Dickinson

https://sinodun.com

Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
Magdalen Centre
Oxford Science Park
Robert Robinson Avenue
Oxford OX4 4GA
U.K.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email