IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fun with draft-pwouters-powerbind

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Thu, 30 April 2020 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC743A0FBA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZb5ZEDheng0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D02C3A0FAB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59F05295DB0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <CD0DBD94-53F9-4E6F-9D4C-33BF40B4FBC1@nohats.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:50:05 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-Id: <D4C121AA-8506-4727-8F5B-C1A2B5A9C75E@dukhovni.org>
References: <20200430033901.GH41308@straasha.imrryr.org> <CD0DBD94-53F9-4E6F-9D4C-33BF40B4FBC1@nohats.ca>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4XobYluM0ejJZQ6R1-W6jwO7zvA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fun with draft-pwouters-powerbind
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:50:09 -0000

> On Apr 29, 2020, at 11:46 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
>> For example, the spec could exclude domain
>> names that start with "_" or "_sentinel".  And the sentinel names could
>> then all live there.
> 
> It already does, because the _prefix really belongs to the domain and is never a delegation. It would be a hassle if we have to make signed delegations for _tcp (for TLSA) or _opengpgkey or _smimea records.

Yes, just finished finished reading the draft and noticed the same.  Perhaps not
such a crazy refinement, if we're arriving at it independently.

I support the adoption of the draft.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email