Re: [DNSOP] SIG(0) useful (and used?)

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Sat, 23 June 2018 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F937130ECB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phuAzPOhd3AB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9919C130DFA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id F0EF67A330A; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:14:49 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180623211449.GB12346@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <6C8533C2-6510-4A0E-A7EA-50EB83E43A7D@isc.org> <CD6DB8C1-108A-433E-8CD9-34F549844D10@isc.org> <D7C0BCA9-A5E1-4168-9601-209DF8B2902A@isc.org> <8E78A662-D498-4117-85F5-2DB7D4979EC8@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8E78A662-D498-4117-85F5-2DB7D4979EC8@isc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4_aili2RUbJgXnfxYgd4DQKj6XQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] SIG(0) useful (and used?)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:14:53 -0000

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 07:47:16AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:

> SIG(0) has miles of potential.  Active Directory shows that hosts updating
> their own addresses is useful.

And not just their own addresses.  On my TODO list is making DANE
more manageable by (optionally) allowing the holder of a private
key correspoding to a TLSA "DANE-EE(3) X Y" record to update the
containing RRset to introduce the TLSA record for the next key.

> SIG(0) provides a similar mechanism without the overhead of AD.   It
> actually works well today if you spend the time to hook it into a system.
> What�s needed is for OS vendors to ship machines with support enabled.
> 
> Use AD if the machine is part of  a AD domain and this if it isn�t.  It
> really isn�t that hard to do it just requires OS developers to do it.

I think that SIG(0) could be quite useful, perhaps it was just
introduced before its time.

-- 
	Viktor.