IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

yaojk <jiankangyao@hotmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2015 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jiankangyao@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8BA1B53CD; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZpNxrEAJ1O5; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SNT004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com (snt004-omc4s13.hotmail.com [65.55.90.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 981E21B53CB; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SNT407-EAS40 ([65.55.90.201]) by SNT004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:13:38 -0700
X-TMN: [eHlrrxb1gOcdaN1qSbg8bD228gsS94sE]
X-Originating-Email: [jiankangyao@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <SNT407-EAS402B99E97DD7C392AF65A3B7210@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
References: <SNT407-EAS358C1970FD337AB12A4E9A3B74E0@phx.gbl> <SNT407-EAS236960872DAC35D4C1D4EEAB74A0@phx.gbl> <8D29DE86-A6D3-4287-9187-5724A6E70B6F@gmail.com> <SNT407-EAS224EA7923DAA4DE2EB5DECBB7270@phx.gbl> <SNT407-EAS279DCE97242311D3AF1BA29B7210@phx.gbl> <5630B572.9010402@gmail.com>
From: yaojk <jiankangyao@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <5630B572.9010402@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:24:01 +0800
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2015 12:13:38.0098 (UTC) FILETIME=[137B3920:01D1117A]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4ft9a-jXETIR3WBAh7onM0I-Kvw>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:13:42 -0000




> 在 2015年10月28日，19:45，Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> 写道：
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 10/28/15 7:37 AM, yaojk wrote:
>> Hello
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/agenda?item=agenda-94-dnsop.html
>> 
>> From the agenda above, I see that it doesn't include my draft
>> discussion. Could you kindly assignee 5 minutes to introduce the draft-
>> yao-dnsop-root-cache？
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jiankang Yao
> 
> Hi
> 
> Thanks for asking, but we're not going to give time to this draft.  



It might be your power as chairman. But I think that your arguments to block the draft discussion is not reasonable.

> The consensus of comments about the draft is that it has many issues that need to be addressed.  


Unfortunately, I haven't such senses of your called consensus.



> Also, the work does not significantly improve what currently exists.

How to prove that? Could you kindly list one by one?




BTW,
As the chair, could you kindly list the criteria of what item can be discussed?

Is there any ietf document which specify the criteria?

Thanks.


Jiankang Yao
> 
> thanks
> tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email