Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt)

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Fri, 02 February 2018 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F61252BA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:42:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNZPIo5qyhaz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8261C12D869 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t139so32905922lff.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:42:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3QpAf3PEZ5KinhFJOMIn8XrPL8ZbkcepcqG7a88Vs2o=; b=DfZrZsw2yVkdAAZ9YRtLYn4O5fk5+6frZxFd93TcrxE3XaqCDgyaRYSbb0BBeqcw1P 317VffLspe64DVVEQIMSQh43NnnhGVAF+A8gOrjVb95LqD2wW1HO5DJfmFE47bmhpsqJ Ue+zSboyUeUZXM5vce+4FUnsFSf/gbDlvOtaqtsaT0SMsgeVtcPrS53aWRV1qw10SlsR 6ABWcew9IGiguKcejLoiKs8meH/tUwmRLGxghg78eluO/5opwfJdqx2JzjSnSuzE1yem ds898o/unv9aYGFnibOBt7R2cGQ1pB488tdGNwO5myGQz3MAyJJmh8iUfpTEMnNsh8Zz DILg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3QpAf3PEZ5KinhFJOMIn8XrPL8ZbkcepcqG7a88Vs2o=; b=FlyXmRr+BPEo+m7lZyi7iq8zrDC97zRbPEtnWKjQCXImwYh5DOS/xjnIXfga3kxG9N o4joLD7Pt5d1ZSGIKfUnsrdyJS/puxepc48dZa1jDzTxxEgBh/XESj4nATxD8sBpmxqX ipc0d9eUu+zNnEquadx2jUYJFbY9mv1uiKxi3Ry4Iaco54j5WLCr6hav6HwWM8AgUHCA aspF5x93K7W1o5H1tf6N/zxUI/oWYqpk4K3w81gHf2oS0+zuSGKl34Q6Xl0zJSiA9VbA m2Q5jAOOjqolfKbGJaqGKK7+pSbcgSZKfhK/fLp2C3CF6kwyTHU8tFcTsp/qYMFp5RKE ItHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytesq2FOhaq6LGKvteuLqROpV7XgTUrIeHuYWvM0EoUsVRyJyHa4 KmBOt/3IMktGx/LSGCZM1MGn2ZKec8Nua4Gr6Yzejw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227eQLZ8+3M5+jxfIB2BgMRzdMBMVtYmXTEP40Vt1Vj5psQF21mvmeQOgESrjLyIk1a2SSwhL2T4gUrfmL0BR7U=
X-Received: by 10.46.66.87 with SMTP id p84mr21995172lja.3.1517596967691; Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:42:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.84.21 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:42:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <12CE7FE6-1B26-438C-851A-14B74B91D425@vpnc.org>
References: <151062636258.5917.14497839377888768972@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180128080134.24987d69@titan.int.futz.org> <CAHw9_iLDid5-3JJ5gffdsR_PMCAEwwxB3i7ORLiBVtKwmt0khQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180129233755.3697ee79@grisu.home.partim.org> <20180130152459.GE18485@mx4.yitter.info> <9787FD03-4E91-46DC-92E0-85513D6A9B40@hopcount.ca> <20180130185128.GI19193@mx4.yitter.info> <CAKr6gn0LSjtJL_zci1i=aUYq6bd7vDos_QfiEiS=W0kygXS_MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJObyd4KPL9BsnARDCf-qaS_eYCMuWnn0SV+10OeYzgoQ@mail.gmail.com> <344C35F8-30C0-4705-8B96-A8E07FDCC34C@vpnc.org> <20180201212014.GD27125@mx4.yitter.info> <12CE7FE6-1B26-438C-851A-14B74B91D425@vpnc.org>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:42:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8Dq3DxC-KU3KpXM3C8q2VnL=_VQoNkCuTTODrO+JhZYHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1c0a142bf99505643f1490"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4kncozKck2ap2e3Pa4hbDj3PSAw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:42:52 -0000

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On 1 Feb 2018, at 13:20, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> It seems plain therefore that a registry of in-band in-label prefixes
>> ought to be created, so that instead of heuristics in IDNA2008 we
>> could tell people to use a real rule.
>>
>> Before I go to the bother of writing this up, are there at least five
>> people who would review it, noting that it must update RFC 5891 to be
>> useful?
>>
>
> <raises hand>
>
> As a note, this is related to but different from <
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf>gt;, which has been
> expired for four months but is still a WG document.
>
>
> I will review.

-- 
Bob Harold