Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-dnsop-intentionally-temporary-insec-00.txt

Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz> Mon, 22 February 2021 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DFF3A1F4C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:25:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-NsiKTp8LGp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:25:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87173A1FBC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:768:2d1c:226::a2e] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:768:2d1c:226::a2e]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4B62140589 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:25:35 +0100 (CET)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <yblzgzxceqt.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <e6cf46e1-b88f-e5c1-d30e-ed8045ec76fe@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:25:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <yblzgzxceqt.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4m8WXJmIDrbdLeQHODtraJnWzco>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-dnsop-intentionally-temporary-insec-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:25:53 -0000

Hello.

I'm certainly not fond of trying to call this "best practice".
I'd rather try persuading people to either improve such tooling or 
switch production to another one, but I understand that in real life 
there are cases where the proposed approach may be considered a better 
choice than a proper rollover.

--Vladimir @ knot-resolver.cz