[DNSOP] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http

+1, there is enough room for us to improve. 

When I first drafted some idea, I was told that the IETF work is driven by
the community. It's good. As one of the co-authors, I'm fairly open for
suggestions. But for experimental draft, I'm not sure whether we should
stick to the scope of original experiment we have done (hiding the DNS
traffic in web traffic ), or expand it for potential usage. I will ask and
handle it to the WG people if it is adopted by the WG.

As to the question of performance, we once had done some simple test
(http://www.dnsv6lab.net ) . It is not so scary and almost equal to DNS/TCP.
I'm glad to see more comprehensive test result if some guys are interested
on that. 

Davey

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Paul Hoffman
发送时间: 2016年7月13日 3:22
收件人: dnsop
主题: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http

Folks, this is a call for WG adoption, not a design exercise. If the WG
adopts the document, we will have plenty of opportunity to fine-tune or make
major changes. Such as:

On 12 Jul 2016, at 11:51, Shane Kerr wrote:

> I recognize that HTTP/2 is definitely a better option because of 
> out-of-order replies, but I worry about requiring it. It's still quite 
> new and language support may be spotty. But I guess given it's 
> popularity this shouldn't be a huge problem, so maybe that is a 
> reasonable recommendation.

If this WG adopts the document and then says "but we want to use an older
version of the HTTP protocol", we should expect a fair amount of push-back
during IETF Last Call.

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop