[DNSOP] ECS and SVCB

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Wed, 24 March 2021 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8DD3A0B8C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ooj2KPbuRd3m for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85E9C3A0B72 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id x7so194299wrw.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t5hrr/5fpdR/I1ckBw1hNtJvzGaVRZPzi7izrqUuW9o=; b=MKDOPpuevg31jVpY79rckfpaM9HJbtuLuWuutbXzUEM6rSNIsAZiuUWAUkLqcRWT6k 9CdJKegoYJ1TrTydx9/QmVb4cn6rlYZgXdQLfMCKplBAxncai8U4diCEPBc3gq51iej9 3gulYDtB79z2aHhMBJanNATJG3NprUCBMHBD8zBNvnA6iPxy086VHLD/eJ0SJ2mchKmr 6K9KrPU/X+IKsPLhNz9ZfPL4iqh9HQOgCaOL7ScTxM0umizLAVOhJyLzJHsoykYV8hbH cTrOZpt+BxhXUOR9657dWrDtFmGE3H6swlnfbAz5JV6nIoxRMoPG9fnAIvwiRwIYyvy3 7ltw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t5hrr/5fpdR/I1ckBw1hNtJvzGaVRZPzi7izrqUuW9o=; b=Ji4ct12Ko2XuTRFQSVN99Zt7phYJYZrA3RbzxMIzXRA0JG+IY/kVVK4T3/mx0wc6wO Tlr8Be0BQL43lPZUoo1bFofTsMDSjwpDPJJ0pBcCVvVvRltXFgXJ6kvCvY1zm34qwE1P Px2O7tfhhLY52JiCqOCeYNFQAAUfDTaaloyedXagm2WLCmwWvV8kjoy5FuvNgYI8cHgt g3wwWltViJBx5MKtm53XmVX+pwYEjekPKYamVi6UgS6VZleTc2bqlORCFBQdY5+LXo7u 5U1CgXB4rZ3lGScqjFYFPeWXe9sT6OJUXYVplMyjyVL5zmkTlB7z/QoIm5ZfbzbqKZGR ZNrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/nQIzvl5B6c4yMCHVLj3tCUwdd2AOnmMco7kPBM575keOfSLn +lpxWPDLo9mVXTT7bzYAiOLykOD0dssBuSomQSDtisCE1smGNw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFpH73Qd6C88/UCsp9ogFHkbjrmjxHB1+58FjwDwqL1v2wkOsYWx+BUKZxUa3CZ8veOaMvg4YhXaTTCAQyEZw=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6b84:: with SMTP id n4mr4289480wrx.258.1616620803478; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:19:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsAgSFrOJ07P5TjWY0BpzjxSoddfLd2sOe8SncE3LhfwnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000c18a4005be4edc91"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5-SWCC_YcHLrkdTn8AXzF4LiADs>
Subject: [DNSOP] ECS and SVCB
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 21:20:10 -0000

In the course of WGLC for SVCB, a few people have highlighted nontrivial
interactions between SVCB and EDNS Client Subnet (ECS).  To clear this up,
the authors are considering [1] adding a section explaining how SVCB and
ECS should interact, for entities that are trying to do both.

Please review if you have an interest in these topics.

Thanks,
Ben Schwartz

[1]
https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/308/files?short_path=3500257#diff-3500257c8185942fb80e67b6128f73e7807ad42cdbeee3caf923c376e899235f