IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Michelle Cotton via RT] [IANA #1168741] Early Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 13 May 2020 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D374E3A102D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 03:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPVXDA85A9Dy for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 03:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABBEC3A102E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 03:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id di6so7822405qvb.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 03:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=knCfAdXlfuE2Ou/vI4WIHFROedXpXwBhAQMaAMy0MO4=; b=mAP5nc25wPTFusGXg1Jv+QuE+yLK+FT22E54ME/g2AmFua8qIZmXpNXCiXjjWjJraK QZ3YRzAnNsdo1evvRb12zf68mpTGuh89haKu8C8Rd0RieayIUI90Qgg3ElTDsx4zaG9w oZgimk6s/8eDcwt70/mmLAAbCgX4eZIdP+ROg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=knCfAdXlfuE2Ou/vI4WIHFROedXpXwBhAQMaAMy0MO4=; b=eN05Z4plFPFPQDQ3Q0fmBb28pG/y1Av9shI1tdPBP1iMQA0CHWaSThu+2vsp9fMQTs CXcUkKy6Po/CJqj4DeBDoiUk0A4aIXowzIGwBYxsWRf5IBfHyIInbJnLVZ82ABbrqRyE 5UPjQkzfGGVuqHggpykRlhIXIymigUhmsCIWM1IxLLFIh0KPUYnGw26wTFvAQ5ivFpDG Fwh0rP/gyIsmRpiTG1XQyQ8kcACPrtYsKSSJH6iX8zGmX/lxAAiXYPI2rEu7zmpagj/W KswMiituwpxxwDlky1ITqrsd76rdR1sl66c3tbAGNvua5chOaznUJiCMKNkI1cKJvkIM uqYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rtw9UPhlhheWu0yRNQSEmTSbU9XpuEbUGy4wYE2OTI1UzlMKF y/cIzk16St+3M6KKR1yBCY4qpiGx+NY0YQFb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVWz7ThTYQnfq1Nyxd3cR55JV1VvgXJbjG792XdXT3gXL2UusDCuyzOrYvdCt9qmvoKO3a4w==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5290:: with SMTP id v16mr10360400qvr.240.1589365559348; Wed, 13 May 2020 03:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:f2c0:e784:c7:8972:8673:6d53:e208? ([2607:f2c0:e784:c7:8972:8673:6d53:e208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l2sm13355062qkd.57.2020.05.13.03.25.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 May 2020 03:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Message-Id: <161A989F-0485-40E3-910A-B06E1B8B160E@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_47D20C86-BB38-455C-9A50-FF5EF9A87F37"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:25:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k11gjo9h.fsf@nic.cz>
Cc: DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
References: <rt-4.4.3-16391-1588963960-511.1168741-37-0@icann.org> <87k11gjo9h.fsf@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5Bv0rw7DOQpz67SUxqZamhijV7I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Michelle Cotton via RT] [IANA #1168741] Early Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 10:26:04 -0000

Hi Lada,

On 13 May 2020, at 03:19, Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:

> IANA did an early review of the draft in $subj. As you can see below, Michelle proposes that the XSLT stylesheet be removed upon publication of the RFC.
> 
> I am personally not much in favour of doing so. First, I don't expect that any future changes to the stylesheet will be necessary or even possible: the rules for updating YANG modules (sec. 11 in RFC 7950) effectively block any substantial changes. So, if it ever turned out that the way how the registries are modelled in YANG needs to be change, it would most likely require an entirely new YANG module.
> 
> And, more importantly, the XSLT stylesheet is also kind of a formal record of the consensus regarding the mapping of registry data to YANG (there are indeed a few other options how to do it). If a change was necessary (modulo errata), then it is IMO appropriate to run it through the IETF process again.
> 
> Any thoughts on this?

You seem to have addressed Michelle's concern, above. Did you give that response to her as well as sending it to this list? What did she think?


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email