From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Message-Id: <161A989F-0485-40E3-910A-B06E1B8B160E@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_47D20C86-BB38-455C-9A50-FF5EF9A87F37";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:25:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k11gjo9h.fsf@nic.cz>
Cc: DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
References: <rt-4.4.3-16391-1588963960-511.1168741-37-0@icann.org>
 <87k11gjo9h.fsf@nic.cz>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5Bv0rw7DOQpz67SUxqZamhijV7I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Michelle Cotton via RT] [IANA #1168741] Early Review:
 draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
Precedence: list


--Apple-Mail=_47D20C86-BB38-455C-9A50-FF5EF9A87F37
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

Hi Lada,

On 13 May 2020, at 03:19, Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> =
wrote:

> IANA did an early review of the draft in $subj. As you can see below, =
Michelle proposes that the XSLT stylesheet be removed upon publication =
of the RFC.
>=20
> I am personally not much in favour of doing so. First, I don't expect =
that any future changes to the stylesheet will be necessary or even =
possible: the rules for updating YANG modules (sec. 11 in RFC 7950) =
effectively block any substantial changes. So, if it ever turned out =
that the way how the registries are modelled in YANG needs to be change, =
it would most likely require an entirely new YANG module.
>=20
> And, more importantly, the XSLT stylesheet is also kind of a formal =
record of the consensus regarding the mapping of registry data to YANG =
(there are indeed a few other options how to do it). If a change was =
necessary (modulo errata), then it is IMO appropriate to run it through =
the IETF process again.
>=20
> Any thoughts on this?

You seem to have addressed Michelle's concern, above. Did you give that =
response to her as well as sending it to this list? What did she think?


Joe


--Apple-Mail=_47D20C86-BB38-455C-9A50-FF5EF9A87F37
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQSAt40QkiztAcvphdg0jwy9hlI6LAUCXrvLNAAKCRA0jwy9hlI6
LKl0AJ44ij7LtW3gsjzdAYklnKguQ/WeqQCfRzQSlx3FsY6kag26eLTaSJbnJZs=
=ptUd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_47D20C86-BB38-455C-9A50-FF5EF9A87F37--