IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 25 January 2018 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E860312EA9E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:22:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8kt4CYF6VjWS for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A6612EA5A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C85321BD6; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:22:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:22:38 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RlC1on IaA8oEvUUGc8nANbuC2zNZstdalkdRo/r4Wxs=; b=ada5SL+W5IX4+4vxV97KpW 2o1G0b5nZJSElfw7N3/Log27a0QGSi5HqyyCq49yTx7BHAuj4xFoq/19X5l/F3Gi 5R/gMRVqluoTIXLgcrBAK6v0L678Jv6jbbMOlbpo/7A3sWV9IEdKZShFwg7T0dhI wceArH6GGytnLG6Vs9Ypije/q8lIYPmkrb9lg8p0RK+ZRp3NVfGVlk4nDv0hyLdK fPbYVHf3Zr8p+/XULhbVqnmlRUdd9Acm5eHbxOC4M3wqJqBqx88iogMsEjx2DhRX 2wmj/UzRfHHCRtlVDG/izxsGVofH9cBe4OHNUQob1XnAjMLn+/3buM7b5onFiNWw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jjxqWt0LMCpSHrTSH3HiklIFTZ2NdmgCGH4JArCyj5sBvb2yX_6lpA>
Received: from [192.168.1.72] (unknown [195.147.34.210]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 020AD241E0; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:22:37 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C202)
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqf+GqYGFRAsXbBPymQLXoJRs_AxvVHhtcMJF1LEvTL7sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:22:36 +0000
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77B805CC-E8FE-4B09-A261-C5CB13707EE4@dotat.at>
References: <CANV=THh6bOxd_UW=TuLonWzz0KyGapkGWpMiNuu54W=45gFAvg@mail.gmail.com> <20180124205620.GZ3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1801251558440.5022@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAJE_bqf+GqYGFRAsXbBPymQLXoJRs_AxvVHhtcMJF1LEvTL7sQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5I8HsUv_hFKtE9T0DbOb8nRKD6c>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 20:22:42 -0000

> On 25 Jan 2018, at 18:36, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> Could you be more specific about it?  It may be a minority
> implementation, but I thought traditional stub resolver
> implementations in BSD variants systems (getaddrinfo/gethostbyname
> with the backend of libresolv) didn't hardocde special logic for
> "localhost." yet.  It's true that such implementations refer to
> /etc/hosts and it has system-installed mapping between 'localhost.'
> and ::1 by default.  Do you mean (in addition to hardcoding the
> special logic) this kind of combination of generic implementation with
> default system configuration?

Exactly, yes.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email