Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPMoving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 30 July 2021 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A9F3A141B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bByKI_KSIWXB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5E63A141D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EB7BB21892; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <E5E151E6-0BC0-44FE-BF7C-6B2ED207894F@dnss.ec>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:34:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <E5E151E6-0BC0-44FE-BF7C-6B2ED207894F@dnss.ec> (Roy Arends's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:20:43 +0100")
Message-ID: <ybleebfjurt.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5Nx4BTvEarOFotVWmJyv6Sq64o8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPMoving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:34:46 -0000

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> writes:

> Essentially, instead of making the pond safe, we’ll have a warning
> sign that using the pond is at their own risk.

The wording of said warning sign is the critical element, IMHO.
Certainly my support of the document greatly depends on said wording.

In the end, there should be a goal behind why we want to publish
something.  If that goal is "know people do this.  don't do this.
please stop", then that may be a reasonable goal.  If we're just going
to document history, without recommendations (to stop), then I think it
may bring more harm than good.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI