IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D29132D8C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-xjmckqe1Oh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50376132331 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id z143so4162133qkb.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=T1vLNLFEyl0XTU25Mbso6orCYBBciVY4EyZNeCnC+/c=; b=jUN0sgnDA5AGVfcZbtk9zzLdC3oI1stSsk7v49SeW4h64wuoRTNxR4DTHBukAci7gG rM5OMw/OGiCYozow5vWbFfUId1xfxKke6drHI1Wju7nD0JoUxLUIlNEqiVimnAZQmPu/ l531MUftrEP1oYJKnJL2FlAiye1WTyXji9QARIg3qrielUXS68gWs48+hCMW7HSu9NGO F09joExTW2UYFZKUxIZ1krLSrngYVOVDKyP92tPX5qaa/NQnv2hMGfmmreCIzPAfddaW wzCicaqVxTUogTiRphyZcqn2td2r+RxXphTxR9u3GDNo6jJcQJRSF4ZGzG3W/1OMY3to zOgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=T1vLNLFEyl0XTU25Mbso6orCYBBciVY4EyZNeCnC+/c=; b=m+zyjtPlwnncRvk8H/BfVVFspJE68xNxlBbqjUI2t4/z3oCJWt9EBJJMsH6gjMxrSz hQxDre1q7n9JynReazdnM6gBhs9o5U76wedLlhx7YTlZmKatNvnn7r3bFQT9NSEY4tfW RQCJntFhjHSDCqTFeTK/VSiGjDFVXuevJPMbfiEHsx3kjebf+kqaTzot6JJrk5ppTImU dY5T0zIPtt41Lg5stH+dd9M6miSx22wKxuOwfaAiKOAOJ4bE/YgmVmoWmLMSprLoYxu1 r3b+61uj03SbHu3N6hwJYLImTcUdQzGP/Ym8EmR+syICzPL+x/NeiqjrV//7MM6Y1h4O YztA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhN81IpBv84QSB6r6xJMU85VUXd6tkkHo42Iw28pxVY0yT17iuZ zqRtnawENBTuok+k
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAJ8CqIfs9e7rc9nAkIleSe4GXrqRt1AjovTrb4Y9cY9AR1C8jhNUVeJKawakbRkGEbUu+ZBg==
X-Received: by 10.55.167.197 with SMTP id q188mr294074qke.234.1505346205466; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cavall.ether.lede.home (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t123sm9870942qkh.39.2017.09.13.16.43.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <82F11EFD-0FB8-4E92-BF70-F0A1A1A00D07@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7ECD8E58-0CE8-43AF-92AD-B1AB78646B31"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:43:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH9QwgC-aSPf2KZPOcQtZVmTRZek5OcbXTt-N+BOcCM=Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
References: <20170913021529.2540.qmail@ary.lan> <26E56255-6169-4626-95E8-A9D6A2D5EB39@fugue.com> <20170913030645.946E8855120E@rock.dv.isc.org> <25E28EFD-DF13-42F1-A872-400CC1CFBBF9@fugue.com> <CAAiTEH9QwgC-aSPf2KZPOcQtZVmTRZek5OcbXTt-N+BOcCM=Zg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5SzFXxZYedUa6ohoIff0Iv09pe8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:43:28 -0000

On Sep 13, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> wrote:
> I thought the goal was to ensure that localhost names map to loopback.   

No.  If that were the goal, we might well be proposing using DNS to provide that information.   The goal is to make localhost less of an attack surface.   At least that's _my_ goal!   :)

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status