IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Thu, 20 February 2020 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656F11200D8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:31:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5dcTqN0y01i for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:31:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kmx5a.knipp.de (kmx5a.knipp.de [195.253.6.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDAD61200CD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:31:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-Recipient: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Original-Recipient: klaus.malorny@knipp.de
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx5a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48NTqt3dgrz4vrs; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:31:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [195.253.2.27] (mclane.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.27]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD91E723C8; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:31:04 +0100 (MEZ)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de> <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com> <3ead518d-f166-1c36-c3e9-18aeb355d160@pletterpet.nl>
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Message-ID: <57323a0d-6d33-ceef-1e99-58d61eff16dd@knipp.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:31:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/75.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3ead518d-f166-1c36-c3e9-18aeb355d160@pletterpet.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: kmx5a.knipp.de; none
X-Rspamd-Server: v1117
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48NTqt3dgrz4vrs
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8391, ipnet:195.253.0.0/16, country:DE]; LOCAL_WL_IP(0.00)[195.253.2.54]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5X0Po2TfJL0965Xth_KQ9N49rQ0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:31:43 -0000


Hi,

thanks all for responding, this was very informative for me. The lack of 
interest for the ANAME draft is a bit pity. We have some customer requests in 
this direction and I was hoping to be able to offer them a standards compliant 
solution. So now I have to rethink our strategy.

Regards,

Klaus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email