Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 21 February 2019 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4312F1A2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Amg1GRLbeicc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59AFD1279E6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id s22so13981857pfh.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=s4ZXUwIAlG8Y7HL67/cs+evXZQLVMANxA/uk2v4DXmY=; b=q2X6I8+P41ivzh2xOymeKgkWuZxRDjJh4CWgoY3v9Dd5LEz0QuTb2MJYpNmJT6xu0Z OF2t9RVH4QAhBnOUfAuQWxpM6KJYNYt1A91RLODD0XIRX8381aGkGpqNl4Iuaysw78KG d1UgWRhIobOFCGJqql1qF62q6qzJpPICgVW81MX7Re5sFDiQEcrn4DYjqyQujNMJbUbe oNkN4RdToNQHVzqP+FnIyO4WW3p7UV5+E+aFUF0GvtwIKPLshLBDQCU281uYlqvul71g AO+eHB8QknrUBLkdnmUmnUNnvwj/oYVPzDFxCTcVcub4q9RrFGagcaZaopLIzwmLNSCx jECA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=s4ZXUwIAlG8Y7HL67/cs+evXZQLVMANxA/uk2v4DXmY=; b=PLWmxQ3kMl4zSi3+hLsM0l4Qo9nzmDDBKQQ1L6/ln0MbjKYJBbsY9n/kCqW4wLWynM rcCC+kQyn2jgxLYlt2NI+2U3ReaL2bu2FVsXeZQ/11haf5FC+2WhrzxiguNjY9Jt1Js3 oNz51PZIciQeMAsSIqd5OPq95ABXVmnBE47tU4KAaCgiILXgkYimw7nWqdrF5ohpVDCl SGJDkteReQJEZ+BHXIjGAHrDdU6fNy3rmaiAykKxjNNoDhakRUWPOguyayMl/qa3XHqt y1l62ReUW896PI46B0Zb0cY0dwsPVN5St4NmwoXV5NCrOxz6F1Ug8CCNwGvCmxkxxR/v DpQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAub209/TT60qBjJutH/QCOReSPvdMJzcWwDLmzQDV9whUait8MQ5 tr9xSQ6aaBNOYt5/Rl4AifT00Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IavVeji0BMDFXLEJix+mGk6u09gkPRxm/3FYcbQHu07u49e2bLkSjZ9MwSKmL+TYyRXTcO2pQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:31d6:: with SMTP id x205mr8083829pgx.41.1550761966280; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.5.110] ([12.217.162.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f67sm30631419pff.29.2019.02.21.07.12.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <382BAB3C-C127-46E1-B931-4717A33BD75A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0311F394-FACF-45E6-93F4-4734F5BEF7BC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:12:43 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri7u5uCwcXgDrovgpEnhZCpkGGDMrxLHxbFVNvnveUPwWA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
References: <155053239541.25848.12960190085730298684.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <969D8BA1-6ED3-47E8-AFFD-2BEE8EA3E66B@bangj.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902191219070.766@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <0DE33073-93B1-4CF5-B12D-B7266E21E8B2@timwattenberg.de> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902191715230.30381@bofh.nohats.ca> <1F461BFA-638A-4607-84BD-F8B8597A1114@isc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902200028210.29865@bofh.nohats.ca> <646C86F6-C10D-43DF-ADE8-19222994E4D1@hopcount.ca> <E41DDEED-DF50-481F-9378-D721C3612643@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902201928250.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <9330E97B-76BF-4C6F-8F6F-01349A3E7427@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902211215480.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAKW6Ri7u5uCwcXgDrovgpEnhZCpkGGDMrxLHxbFVNvnveUPwWA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5YqyBjnsw_qq0LAL2eSqM8sl1Ac>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:12:50 -0000

On Feb 21, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> wrote:
> A more radical approach would be to have just one hash per item per record.

One way to make this document less complex yet just as useful would be to simply have a record that contains what is to be deleted, rather than a hash of what is to be deleted.   It’s not at all clear to me that there’s value in using the hash—to me it just seems to create uncertainty.