Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

["Ralf Weber" <[e-mail]>]

Moin!

On 21 Dec 2016, at 15:36, william manning wrote:
> the complaints about operator participation in the IETF go back decades.
>  no news there.
So you don't want operator participation in the IETF?

> in fact, there are operator driven fora for just such activities, DNS-OARC
> comes to mind.
DNS-OARC AFAIK isn't about producing documents

> this draft actively destroys trust in the DNS, which reduces trust in the
> Internet overall.
I fail to see that and remember to most people the Internet these days is
delivered by large operators, so if you want to get stuff deployed at scale
you have to work with them. DNSSEC adoption on the recursing side e.g was
non existent until Comcast and later Google decided to do validation. Now
it is double digit percentage of all clients sitting behind an validating
resolver.

> is that really what you want out of the IETF?
I want the IETF to be relevant and the stuff of documents we produce to
actually being deployed on the Internet.

So long
-Ralf