IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld

Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-6@u-1.phicoh.com> Wed, 23 April 2025 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b6CAFA0C7@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF65F1FDE8C8 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 02:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DfNVvClbdmKj for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 02:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2a10:3781:2413:1:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5375A1FDE8C0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 02:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1u7WVt-0000MTC; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:35:29 +0200
Message-Id: <m1u7WVt-0000MTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b6CAFA0C7@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <m1u5h1G-0000LcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <83666fd3-a51f-46e1-a5ac-0b9a46361480@desec.io> <49E3B1B6-E960-4A46-9C5D-2721FD57132D@depht.com> <3b5fb9e7-8a2b-420f-a2fb-dd6f6a0b88ae@isc.org> <89047B78-A2B1-43F2-A996-94DF1E90538A@depht.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:25:54 +0200 ." <89047B78-A2B1-43F2-A996-94DF1E90538A@depht.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:35:28 +0200
Message-ID-Hash: 4MCTMD2XFFF2URNYWGHGFGD526VGFA3X
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4MCTMD2XFFF2URNYWGHGFGD526VGFA3X
X-MailFrom: pch-b6CAFA0C7@u-1.phicoh.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/60TefzuGxk86TZq0ZCV0EhEdR_o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

> > Just to clarify: Are you suggesting ICANN board cannot ever issue
> > another resolution on this matter?
> >
> I cant speak for the Board, I can only read what they publish and
> interpret it.

I assume this is something for the ICANN-liason within the IETF.

If there is working group consensus that an insecure delegation for internal
is the best option then we should ask the liason to contact the ICANN board.

Other options we have are:
1) do nothing, it is not an IETF issue.
2) recommend against using internal as currently specified.
3) add a negative trust anchor to validators.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status