IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane-00.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 13 December 2021 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0B13A0B05 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:08:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZD1Nm_aMDyRv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA1B3A0B02 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JCXcf258zz3Ql for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:08:02 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1639426082; bh=R2O6G6aiYZwwvwe8rdsjNkMqcimpgJtS8/67r9Pact0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=oQ3qDlw7j9f5d9GNEGt4JkdujkTBJZZSUqJdejmnrTzo7hdfTO3a3cJpQDphi9YfN Jwn2VNDR9ayjoKajrWCQ/lL0xcbYB6Axjs1klpJYGT9iRLFrYV39Jtf2iIWuS+EeBB 4SK7TI+PGQZGCU0iUdqKIM55iOlO7WC8//PxmBAw=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E3HRmXsGy30O for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:08:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:08:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2ED201D2479; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:08:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7B21D2478 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:08:00 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:08:00 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7633467E-B9BC-4365-93A3-47503E20C571@icann.org>
Message-ID: <682d641c-6e19-fa9d-7487-a3f4d9c8ba8@nohats.ca>
References: <163908832760.8339.4135304026578566025@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHbrMsCbN8+2UCQLCYKvp5RZ_v+srMha5xU25A9Q9F=ASna9xA@mail.gmail.com> <F9919030-4B37-42DE-BE7B-73BAAFDC5433@dukhovni.org> <CAHbrMsDT5-u6n1tJnSjd9X1vMyyp5HcNrvL4NB3Quzi_p5nWfQ@mail.gmail.com> <YbeZyhZXAuLT250e@straasha.imrryr.org> <7633467E-B9BC-4365-93A3-47503E20C571@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/65HtdgfpGyfbZBmiqI2G8c4OGKE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:08:11 -0000

On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:

>> Likely so, or it can be incorporated into a separate update document, if
>> that's deemed more efficient.  With DANE working group no longer around,
>> would "dnsop" be an appropriate home for such work?
>
> That would likely be much worse than creating a DNAEbis WG and having the couple of DANE-related documents there.

I agree :)

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email