Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only home residental networks ...

"Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> Sun, 03 September 2017 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01E613234E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 12:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mathemainzel.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89SsoYd_iNNz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 12:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx06lb.world4you.com (mx06lb.world4you.com [81.19.149.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2CE7132355 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 12:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathemainzel.info; s=dkim11; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=QqpPtLT4EcotRhyFIa03BkPaLdFknuG4KcvzvJdY7qU=; b=VkMwV7wfWlYeUGh+l1Jo0tmHvQfrA4bouOnmEL6O0q64o2BwVHnpDJcnY79l4475q/iX0eqIxwxtomwqQRFg8TSlsZr94O0apCa7irYAYM7Lb+nbMkcnI+ONeKCrBzj33Tb91pmmZ+jJPZlOifVeF3l8aWPAK8XQFnD7xRdrq/w=;
Received: from [90.146.55.206] (helo=home.mail) by mx06lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1doaEs-0000yW-Qw; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 21:07:22 +0200
Message-ID: <59AC52EA.7060403@mathemainzel.info>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 21:07:22 +0200
From: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Organization: Home
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (UNIX; U; Cray X-MP/48; en-US; rv:2.70) Gecko/20110929 Communicator/7.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
CC: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <150428805872.6417.9525310755360551475@ietfa.amsl.com> <59A9B760.2060209@mathemainzel.info> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709011556280.12556@bofh.nohats.ca> <59A9BD75.5010408@mathemainzel.info> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709011612470.12556@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHw9_iKKDFj4SJtpxV=egNB0D=jkBFnQ68N5kOgUBFieexvsTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKKDFj4SJtpxV=egNB0D=jkBFnQ68N5kOgUBFieexvsTA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms010209080304060509080500"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
X-AV-Do-Run: Yes
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.146.55.206
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Walter.H@mathemainzel.info
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx06lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/6EiHfcHHcN-B_Rjtyjma6zGrR-c>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only home residental networks ...
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 19:07:27 -0000

On 03.09.2017 02:29, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Paul Wouters<paul@nohats.ca>  wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Walter H. wrote:
>>
>>>> If you are a company and you are using a hardcoded domain of "local",
>>>> then you have been and still are, completely broken. The only fix is to
>>>> rename your network.
>>> ACK and which non public domain name I can use for this
>>>    that doesn't conflict now and will not conflict in the future?
>>
>> Something that's yours and not squatted. For example
>> internal.mathemainzel.info.
>>
>> Please see the last three years of dnsops and homenet working group list
>> archives.
>>
> ... perhaps the other way of looking at the last thirty three years of
> DNS is that people *do* actually want something like this, and that
> perhaps it is time to actually create something specifically for it.
just a simple question: why hadn't there been such at the very beginning,
which could have prevented situations like the following:

"a company gets the advice to use a ".local" as the internal domain and 
Active Directory;
at these times nobody would have thought, that this could be a 
conflicting problem in the future ...;
and now it is impossible to change this ..."

now telling an admin not to use ".local" is easy, but 15 years ago ...