Re: [DNSOP] Time to update RSAMD5 and perhaps DSA (algs 1 and 3) to MUST NOT?

Viktor,

apart from the I-D in the LC, the upcoming BIND 9.14 release will have:

* GOST removed (as it was deprecated by Russian “upstream”)
* Both DSA algorithms removed (insecure)
* RSAMD5 algorithm to be removed (I just finished the MR and it needs to be reviewed: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/merge_requests/1106)

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@isc.org

> On 1 Dec 2018, at 20:51, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> The IANA DNSSEC parameter registry lists RSAMD5 (algorithm 1) as
> deprecated, and refers to [RFC3110], [RFC4034] which state that
> RSAMD5 is "NOT RECOMMENDED".
> 
>    https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml#dns-sec-alg-numbers-1
> 
> "Survey says" that RSAMD5 is not only deprecated, but is in fact
> no longer used, by any of the ~9 million DNSSEC-delegated domains
> I've been able to find on the public Internet:
> 
>    https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2018-December/018146.html
> 
> It only has the effect of breaking two domains that have only RSAMD5
> in the DS RRset, but have no DNSKEY RRs.  11 domains, have working
> keys for algorithms 5, 7, 8 or 13 with a DS RRset that also lists
> an orphaned algorithm 1 with no RSAMD5 keys at the zone apex.  A
> further 18 domains have RSAMD5 DS RRs, but are simply out of service
> even sans validation.
> 
> This suggests to me that the deprecation of RSAMD5 is a stunning
> success, it is gone, and perhaps it is time to say so:
> 
>    * Authoritative zones SHOULD NOT publish RSAMD5 DS RRs or
>      DNSKEY records.
> 
>    * Validating resolvers MUST ignore RSAMD5 DS RRs and DNSKEY
>      RRs, and MUST treat any zones with only ignored or unsupported
>      DS records as "insecure".
> 
> Perhaps we could be bolder and say the same for DSA (algorithm 3),
> this too is largely gone, but there's a cluster of ~4700 ".me"
> domains with DSA keys.  It is not clear that enabling those domains
> to validate merits ongoing support for algorithm 3.  So we might
> also add DSA to the list, encouraging resolver implementations to
> drop support for both RSAMD5 and DSA.
> 
> -- 
> 	Viktor.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop