IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dnssd] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Wed, 14 February 2018 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C1B12D864 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:13:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smvCMWM938TN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9CD127735 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:13:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [88.212.170.147] (port=56152 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1em6FL-00005R-HE (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:13:51 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+GsU9dL8D58Eko0w9mVRMMTZ7f9NQKx3a0XS7oUGHjniQ@mail.gmail.com> <91E3DCED-7A40-4454-9809-EBF68E942DB0@vpnc.org> <02FF7C21-3421-40C5-A530-BE1D814237B2@cisco.com> <976312C8-4424-4642-A150-21F25FB137EE@fugue.com> <5AFBBFBE-CF5A-4F7A-9AC9-F7E0040BBABD@cisco.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <69fe7033-3276-9458-424c-b5e1d27ea283@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:13:54 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5AFBBFBE-CF5A-4F7A-9AC9-F7E0040BBABD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/6auVMnWPpcbFCnO4q5VhzXDx0Fc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dnssd] Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:13:59 -0000


On 14/02/2018 23:06, Jan Komissar (jkomissa) wrote:

> Currently, there are only plans for DPN, and that would force every
> connection to be TLS.

DPN is the only current _extension_ to DSO.

DSO is also supposed to stand in its own right as a way to improve the
management of long-lived connections.  This does not mandate TLS.

kind regards,

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email