IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B26129EF8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:18:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5dEOCl_Ghw0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x242.google.com (mail-qk0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA9C129EF6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x242.google.com with SMTP id 11so9190840qkl.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:18:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0iAAHayQ1g6bBJBpzLuP7tJWE8aVeSkf7sIp4vJQ0f0=; b=aJqFariQyqbxFulMxb8LUpMXXJZyIqGEXsxjRWHtSMNYWsGZNyCefbgf9xcQklfAlI YPQLsWNlRkITVjtY/Ete0Ix9ifS61AAwb46Ej9PpTGKk7O7cJaUGtM+QnJRats6mKNag 52L1rxwbzQ//8wq8dUazGNtRJ5ryu7bsPCwpnbkvgy4pTge0LZRnIMPFO//mbC8eC9uL bDqjtq15CLhNQ9GfQdGpH7hUmVzYGv71dfaHGsSlP6Cg2vz+wO3Qq8DK6UEA+5pxuJiu skAhVW01X1g+7+LKquSFkL3sOfOVdpIuNRsZLLUquzKNLwxhsTtDNlOnG3sFtIEzLQj2 v6vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0iAAHayQ1g6bBJBpzLuP7tJWE8aVeSkf7sIp4vJQ0f0=; b=rWnItHJX8FiW+ByeTJ5KHelN6rIdzc9E4e4V/28+Brn6MJXKsfUHaoL5S1NBKFtUL4 ILgJP0vR8Ge+FXOvUaNoXVWZ+yP0owQLbuLclo5tcNWT/MCrTHpPQT2/8j+7gQ+FWItI Fd0tbnbyvPSib478/biso2131nBL6AabVZ9+nXESMwBSYBu7sDy0YmRfJPg9YMtqk7Tg fWQqChwIpZXWYC1l/yLt20xndJWWAkBUcbyHzrqbQd0gzlt3l9mzFKsGzqo57E3LnYxy SIB4XERIghs8d32m+7r3M6/B1GcsC7Xvug94YDp0cNPKAWnMPKli9YBL4PFcteTRLMuP EY2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nYR/FcWNXb/PzHO6lPs+ZSM2mykZZq/SxA6/NgPm8BEGYCG4pRjEzmq7H5I24zeA==
X-Received: by 10.55.19.16 with SMTP id d16mr11415666qkh.179.1486397920566; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.19] (c-24-63-89-87.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.63.89.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c41sm904346qtd.3.2017.02.06.08.18.39 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c1af826c-899e-db90-f592-514874660d7a@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:18:38 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BD4FBF8C-0185-47E7-8B81-C3D9B22BFFBA@gmail.com>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com> <4E481C14-1C2B-4A18-A4F2-582208C1DDE3@ogud.com> <6B4E9F56-1487-4E09-9245-167C4790AB3D@gmail.com> <EFFF717C-3A5A-4877-8B40-2D5DF42FD19C@ogud.com> <91527611-CBAE-4DFD-8086-5D6499594108@gmail.com> <c1af826c-899e-db90-f592-514874660d7a@bellis.me.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/6pbi_YLPbYODFKTkouayJMQRx6s>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:18:42 -0000

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> 
>> For now, let’s keep it relevant to the decision this WG has to make,
>> about what to do with .alt and whether it’s important to us to
>> accommodate cases like .homenet. So far, it seems that the .homenet case
>> is much like “locally-served zones”.
> 
> Yes, that's right, with the caveat that all existing locally served
> zones are in the reverse space - there's no forward zones registered (yet).

Could you clarify why that’s relevant?

Does it just come down to the assumption that reverse zones are not supposed to have human-visible/human-friendly names? Or is there some other characteristic of how those names are used that’s important here?


thanks,
Suzanne

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status