Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15.txt

Erik Kline <ek@loon.co> Mon, 05 November 2018 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3E9127333 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:07:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.co
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtUxarcb4k93 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F8B126BED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:07:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id w7-v6so10660223itd.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 19:07:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.co; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=sMNyEvlxs5FFjEnpPpY3XyL7Ko2YKL+mFMq3Z7CtWfw=; b=I9mD5cEQ5NEjvn1eu2YGFe66nLN9xJYQfZDgfMfCV9Ah2SZjcd4lX437vJ1QwO9Jms 7EBlkI1kdY+dr35i7XNro2RLoinEll+WviRbZ2r7wVk9v/a1fUMI7APK3BxqQxHbyULu yqP7isK5WvTqxi2/PTf5FBOwcrXRvN/W5JYKA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sMNyEvlxs5FFjEnpPpY3XyL7Ko2YKL+mFMq3Z7CtWfw=; b=t19aKNGvDWhpRF940o/oLL/l+17jXrTSw5mVdYe2mk2Hu5l7t5Vy98apo4WrV5hstr dwkXzrdVis9uYLzvRK00ZgPGUtjuCPKiBCOoV7do7OE3u/gT4Q6Kx2M9/z/gA84x7C8n REa4sJicb3eOEItpvB8mOHPlKpSnFbzr37/KWLPkk5A1qV4LyuLekBAoHyURLMJShtHb sZhavNKV4DUWHKUMOb33zeCCgEIgzF84Zczrc8UlJ0a0nHeaA+HGdzpGXq4RYy4rbvKj qBOejjZfBa+H0PN8R6MEsuPcwPeC7pK1bJNgTzQu9X1OrBncrwyk+XKf5FrLTidG5uyr bVnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL1J0HsrbQ+VCsAZ0RBSVanz1ZCcZQBDddgJyAn58s3Dx9CNx4C ULcT802qtUZ1jYF+6y/df1WJsdwfby64LgUj1L6HCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dMLoKChVNFHKy+i0drfgzi7biQZp+0rMlkJtDaI3o6m5DnHNKpoKc+2xevxf9S+RrY+9bkfRgPdVj04uHmyuc=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9795:: with SMTP id s21-v6mr18708370jaj.92.1541387252268; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 19:07:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154127656499.10164.10170177869879078794@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAedzxqGsyi1pyyMqmVWiZOgJivr3R1dTWL_9Vwh=0EPCj5DuQ@mail.gmail.com> <e5464033-ae01-4ab8-5c5d-ceb3194d6a71@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <e5464033-ae01-4ab8-5c5d-ceb3194d6a71@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: ek@loon.co
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.co>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:07:20 +0700
Message-ID: <CAAedzxo5oVX-z1qm8foVCYx+ADSDQB8XRVhYQWexu5NPadtaGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7-N-7RF6sMw30f081dlzuF8JtGc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 03:07:35 -0000

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 09:56, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>; wrote:
>
> On 11/4/2018 6:28 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
> > One thing I missed earlier (and please forgive me if this was already
> > discussed), was whether or not _example* should be reserved in the
> > table in draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15#section-4.3.
> >
> > Basically, is there any value in reserving _example* for future RFCs
> > to use (ones that don't care about the specific _foo label but apply
> > to all such labels in some way).
>
>
> Clever suggestion.  Seems like obvious benefit with no obvious detriment.
>
> So I immediately went to add it and then realized that doing this
> cleanly will take an entry for each RR...
>
> Not so sure we want to do that?

Perhaps doable via a {see section #X.Y} e.g.:

              | *       | _example* {see #X.Y} | [this doc]  |

X.Y Reserved _example* label
    For use in RFC documentation describing behaviour applicable to
any label associate with any RR type. More awesome text also goes
here.

I'm not sure about the strictness requirements for this kind of table for IANA.

Also, this doesn't address whether it's an actually useful suggestion. :-)