IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org> Wed, 16 August 2017 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A4513240E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2isp2FVoSO1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.banu.com (mail.banu.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:644b::225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B547713240F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jurassic (unknown [115.117.171.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.banu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F78756A05A1; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:04:48 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:34:45 +0530
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170816070445.GA17023@jurassic>
References: <149908054910.760.8140876567010458934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANLjSvU23OPMM=cETxBiV7j8UhMzMd426VuivxAtboMAB0=7jw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707031317070.21595@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CANLjSvXE4q9PSEc4txKM4OPKXVpT38N_PC2-fDHmihpk29ahcw@mail.gmail.com> <1197245d-6b9a-3c3b-82a0-dc6a1cc3de58@nic.cz> <CANLjSvVe99q4vtTW0TRopmQ0s9hC8HdMze5B6COs8Y_3unir5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiTEH8ntOerB6MGKMS2xcCK3TL9n4fyLq6F+bpUY6oTUpWN8w@mail.gmail.com> <20170816054539.GA12897@jurassic> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708160816580.3655@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20170816064855.GB16977@jurassic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170816064855.GB16977@jurassic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/73O7S_q6NkePYbU74qIFkzKrc9Q>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:04:53 -0000

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:18:55PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> difficult. The amount of damage that a break in DNSSEC validation chain
> could do is far greater than other implementations of crypto such as TLS
> where it is limited to a service.

Caching can also exacerbate such problems making a bad situation worse,
so a fix may not be instantaneously observed. This is unlike with other
popular crypto protocols such as TLS.

		Mukund

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email