Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

sthaug@nethelp.no Wed, 19 July 2017 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A60131CA0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 04:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ts3HIC2ylpix for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 04:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E428112969E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 04:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504C8E6065; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:11:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:11:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20170719.131159.74748443.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: dot@dotat.at
Cc: John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com, dnsop@ietf.org, paul@nohats.ca, ggm@algebras.org
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707191137260.27210@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707191023090.27210@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD081C441@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707191137260.27210@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/73xwwqbHXNklJsx9X6PGuaQXGDE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:12:03 -0000

> Can you provide a technical reason for per-address IPv6 reverse DNS?
> 
> Where I work, we bulk populate reverse v4 DHCP pools just so we know that
> they are pools. We aren't going to bother doing that with v6 because
> everything is a pool, except for a relatively small number of statically
> configured switches and servers and suchlike.

Much the same here. The only IPv6 addresses getting reverse DNS will
be statically configured addresses.

Steinar Haug, AS2116