IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] SIG(0) useful (and used?)

Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org> Tue, 19 June 2018 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ondrej@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2378130F29 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4yDxW7EAuZuV for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E019130F27 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662A33AB007 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:48:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13045160053 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:48:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF79416008D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id jULTnG966fbH for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.0.181] (40.20.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.20.40]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 801C8160053 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Message-Id: <6C8533C2-6510-4A0E-A7EA-50EB83E43A7D@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:48:09 +0200
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/79HL-T2-gSQDV-fQ2u_wPIJBl3Y>
Subject: [DNSOP] SIG(0) useful (and used?)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:48:15 -0000

Hi,

as far as I could find on the Internet there are only SIG(0) implementation in handful DNS implementations - BIND, PHP Net_DNS2 PHP library, Net::DNS(::Sec) Perl library, trust_dns written in Rust and perhaps others I haven’t found; no mentions of real deployment was found over the Internet (but you can blame Google for that)...

Do people think the SIG(0) is something that we should keep in DNS and it will be used in the future or it is a good candidate for throwing off the boat?

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email