IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] "Optimization" in draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 08 January 2015 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113401ACE01 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:13:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qEo0Kju2mLq0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB2A61A9026 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id D58FA3BB67; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:13:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C44B4190726; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:12:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:12:23 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20150108211223.GA32326@sources.org>
References: <CAH1iCirCRpJxHWu62nCSTCmSumXfTNHi=-jt5eWXzRgspJjm9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCip7iGgM=eiaVcy3fHx+KdOJgd5Rh8zLsnDPMgoEnE-HvA@mail.gmail.com> <0BB798D6-60F4-492D-819A-EF4E0F5848B5@virtualized.org> <20150104193602.GA23109@sources.org> <4FF33728-5940-475A-AA41-A197295388AD@virtualized.org> <5D8FEE1D-1283-4F67-B5B9-E2572C3D2185@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5D8FEE1D-1283-4F67-B5B9-E2572C3D2185@vpnc.org>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.7
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7At3rvi6hzClmESAlGCBS-QTjTc>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] "Optimization" in draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:13:11 -0000

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:33:31AM -0800,
 Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote 
 a message of 27 lines which said:

> I have always heard that sending the full name was an optimization
> for authoritative severs 

I will check with the Highest Authorities. In the mean time, I changed
the draft to add there were reasons for this choice (sending the full
qname)
<https://github.com/bortzmeyer/my-IETF-work/commit/c4c6a71da6841af8341189213fa43e5c7539a748#diff-fe24b3ef60c80e496555988e82081362>

Remember also that qname minimisation may be an optimisation (section
4 of draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-00).

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status